The Inspector's Journal Forums
Username:
Password:
Save Password


Join TIJ Forums
Lost Password?
Subscribe to TIJ's Newsletter

All Forums > Technical Forums > Green Technologies >

The Green Fallacy

Previous Topic: Website reference for energy upgrade rebates - Topic - Next Topic: Energy inspections. New TopicReply to TopicShare Topic
Posted By
Previous -  1  2  3  4  5  6  7 - Next 
View Profile
Severna Park, Maryland
Posts: 3458
Joined: May, 2007
Currently offline offline
  
The Green Fallacy
[#77] Posted: 02/16/2010 - 8:14:38 PM
Reply with Quote
Here's an interesting article on the subject.


http://masterresource.org/?p=4307


Also on the subject, I heard it explained like this.

You look into a field and see a flock of geese. All of them are white. You come up with a theory that all geese are white. Science seeks to disprove theories so when you eventually see a black goose, your theory is disproved.

Those that push the man made global warming theory are only counting white geese. They are not even looking for the black ones. Even then, when a black goose is shown to them, they ignore it. How is that science?

John Dirks Jr - Arundel Home Inspection LLC - MD license: 29827
Maryland Home Inspectors - Maryland Home Inspection - Maryland Radon Testing - Baltimore County Rental Inspection
View Profile
Nazareth, PA
Posts: 1050
Joined: Apr, 2002
Currently offline offline
  
The Green Fallacy
[#78] Posted: 02/16/2010 - 9:10:25 PM
Reply with Quote
John, it's pretty ironic that Richard Lindzen, the author of the paper cited in that article (on an energy industry blog) appears to be one of those who sees the black goose, but ignores it. Here is some info on Richard Lindzen from Logicalscience.com.

There is a lot more money behind those denying climate change than there is those who are in your words, pushing it.

The Logical Science mission statement:

When scientific evidence and the interests of an oligopoly or monopoly conflict, science is often suppressed, spun, edited and even deleted. This was true with big tobacco and it is true now with the 3 trillion dollar energy industry. Our goal is to simply defend the international scientific consensus and summarize the industrial misinformation campaign in a way any layman can understand. Every quote, every fact, every sentence will be sourced so the user can quickly and easily check the facts for his or herself. We do not perform any original research. This website merely repeats what the experts are already saying. This website is non-profit. It is built entirely from spare time and out of pocket money. This makes the work slow but it is the best way to minimize any conflicts of interest.

Joe Hancaviz
Nazareth, PA
View Profile
Severna Park, Maryland
Posts: 3458
Joined: May, 2007
Currently offline offline
  
The Green Fallacy
[#79] Posted: 02/16/2010 - 9:46:48 PM
Reply with Quote
Well, the header text of logicalscience.com uses the words "scientific consensus" That's an oxymoron.

There is no "consensus" in true science.

http://www.green-meanie.com/gl...warming/

John Dirks Jr - Arundel Home Inspection LLC - MD license: 29827
Maryland Home Inspectors - Maryland Home Inspection - Maryland Radon Testing - Baltimore County Rental Inspection
View Profile
Severna Park, Maryland
Posts: 3458
Joined: May, 2007
Currently offline offline
  
The Green Fallacy
[#80] Posted: 02/16/2010 - 9:57:53 PM
Reply with Quote
Also, if you look at the bio on the author of Logical Science, it sure looks like he is subjective on the matter of man made global warming.

http://www.logicalscience.com/...tors.htm

John Dirks Jr - Arundel Home Inspection LLC - MD license: 29827
Maryland Home Inspectors - Maryland Home Inspection - Maryland Radon Testing - Baltimore County Rental Inspection
View Profile
Nazareth, PA
Posts: 1050
Joined: Apr, 2002
Currently offline offline
  
The Green Fallacy
[#81] Posted: 02/16/2010 - 10:19:51 PM
Reply with Quote
Quote: Well, the header text of logicalscience.com uses the words "scientific consensus" That's an oxymoron.

There is no "consensus" in true science.


But there is consensus among scientists. Consensus: majority of opinion It's explained here: The Consensus on Global Warming

Quote: Also, if you look at the bio on the author of Logical Science, it sure looks like he is subjective on the matter of man made global warming.


He's got a point of view of course. He also seems to be fair. You have a problem with the following part of his bio?

"I have a keen interest in anthropogenic climate change as I strongly believe anyone with a highschool education can see the flaws in the vast majority of the arguments used by climate change deniers and skeptics. If I am doing my job correctly, you don't have to believe me, because you can always check the references. I don't want people to have to believe me, because that's not what science is about. You should look at the facts and draw your own conclusions. If you can prove me wrong on something I will shake your hand and thank you for teaching me something new."

Joe Hancaviz
Nazareth, PA
View Profile
Ashland, VA
Posts: 2938
Joined: Jan, 2006
Currently offline offline
  
The Green Fallacy
[#82] Posted: 02/16/2010 - 10:37:45 PM
Reply with Quote
Quote: Originally posted by Scottpat

Quote: Originally posted by Terence McCann

Quote: Originally posted by Scottpat

Quote: Originally posted by greyboy39

By the way mate, didnt realize you were british but wasn't it one of your own who stated "for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction" I beleive Isaac Newton if my memory serves me correctly.Why would there not be repercussions for Putting things in an unatural way into our atmosphere, whether it be tommorow or 1000 years from now?


I do believe that Caoimhín is from the Emerald Isle.


So is my Grandfather - and that means?


He likes Guinness!


Guinness is way too high on carbs and calories. Pick another.

I'm guilty of staying to the light side of all of this. simply because, regardles of what anyone believes, our ability to affect any of what has been discussed here happens where the rubber meets the road....


"This above all: to thine own self be true." - William Shakespeare
View Profile
Severna Park, Maryland
Posts: 3458
Joined: May, 2007
Currently offline offline
  
The Green Fallacy
[#83] Posted: 02/16/2010 - 10:39:32 PM
Reply with Quote
Joe, science has nothing to do with opinion.
John Dirks Jr - Arundel Home Inspection LLC - MD license: 29827
Maryland Home Inspectors - Maryland Home Inspection - Maryland Radon Testing - Baltimore County Rental Inspection
View Profile
Needham, Massachusetts
Posts: 1839
Joined: Sep, 2003
Currently offline offline
  
The Green Fallacy
[#84] Posted: 02/17/2010 - 03:43:23 AM
Reply with Quote
Quote: Originally posted by John Dirks Jr

Well, the header text of logicalscience.com uses the words "scientific consensus" That's an oxymoron.

There is no "consensus" in true science.

http://www.green-meanie.com/gl...warming/


Really? Gravity and evolution are theories. Are you sure there is no scientific consensus on them?

Still waiting on Caoimhin...

View Profile
Cartersville, GA
Posts: 255
Joined: Jun, 2005
Currently offline offline
  
The Green Fallacy
[#85] Posted: 02/17/2010 - 07:37:37 AM
Reply with Quote
This is what happens when folks discuss religion on forums like this....
It's so much easier to pray for a bore than to go and see one. --- C. S. Lewis
View Profile
Sagamore Hills, Ohio
Posts: 3113
Joined: Dec, 2003
Currently offline offline
  
The Green Fallacy
[#86] Posted: 02/17/2010 - 07:42:35 AM
Reply with Quote
Quote: Originally posted by Bob White

This is what happens when folks discuss religion on forums like this....


And politics...

Terry



http://www.hlis.net

This space for let - please inquire within.


View Profile
Sagamore Hills, Ohio
Posts: 3113
Joined: Dec, 2003
Currently offline offline
  
The Green Fallacy
[#87] Posted: 02/17/2010 - 07:57:26 AM
Reply with Quote
Quote: Originally posted by Caoimhín P. Connell

Quote: First off, there is general (though not unanimous) agreement in the scientific community that Global Warming is real and human activity can affect it.


Sorry Jim – You’re on the wrong side of objective facts (again).

There is NOT general agreement in the scientific community that GW is real. There is general agreement in the Hollywood community, in the Democratic Party and on The Left – but the general agreement in the scientific community is that there is NO SUCH THING as Global Warming. Sorry mate, I hate to tell you this, Al Gore is not a scientist.

Cheers!
Caoimhín P. Connell
Forensic Industrial Hygienist
www.forensic-applications.com

(The opinions expressed here are exclusively my personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect my professional opinion, opinion of my employer, agency, peers, or professional affiliates. The above post is for information only and does not reflect professional advice and is not intended to supercede the professional advice of others.)

AMDG



This was the first post where politics got dragged into the mix - hence the strawman argument. It provides a window of opportunity to not only throw Jim under the bus (because he happens to disagee, therefore the very classy statement: Sorry Jim – You’re on the wrong side of objective facts (again)) but to turn the topic around to include Hollywood, the Democrats, the Left and just for good measure link Jim, in an obtuse way, as stating Al Gore is/was a scientist.

Very clever.

Terry



http://www.hlis.net

This space for let - please inquire within.


View Profile
Cartersville, GA
Posts: 255
Joined: Jun, 2005
Currently offline offline
  
The Green Fallacy
[#88] Posted: 02/17/2010 - 09:07:57 AM
Reply with Quote
Quote: Originally posted by Terence McCann

Quote: Originally posted by Bob White

This is what happens when folks discuss religion on forums like this....


And politics...


I was thinking of the lesser used definition of religion: something one believes in and follows devotedly; a point or matter of ethics or conscience, and yes AGW warming politics is, to me, included within that definition.

It's so much easier to pray for a bore than to go and see one. --- C. S. Lewis
View Profile
Sagamore Hills, Ohio
Posts: 3113
Joined: Dec, 2003
Currently offline offline
  
The Green Fallacy
[#89] Posted: 02/17/2010 - 09:20:18 AM
Reply with Quote
Quote: Originally posted by Bob White

Quote: Originally posted by Terence McCann

Quote: Originally posted by Bob White

This is what happens when folks discuss religion on forums like this....


And politics...


I was thinking of the lesser used definition of religion: something one believes in and follows devotedly; a point or matter of ethics or conscience, and yes AGW warming politics is, to me, included within that definition.



Sorry Bob - I thought you were refering to this post where Caoimhín brought his religion into the mix: Look, if you are advocating the stewardship of the Earth, then I’m all on-board. As a Catholic, my church has been advocating stewardship of the Earth and her resources for over 2,000 years. Catholics are the original “Conservationists.” This is old hat, friend.

My bad.

Terry



http://www.hlis.net

This space for let - please inquire within.


View Profile
Sagamore Hills, Ohio
Posts: 3113
Joined: Dec, 2003
Currently offline offline
  
The Green Fallacy
[#90] Posted: 02/17/2010 - 09:30:51 AM
Reply with Quote
At this juncture I must say thanks to Mike et al. for letting this play out. They could have easily pulled the plug stating numerous infractions of forum policy while trying to protect and shelter.

Takes big brass ones - thanks.

Terry



http://www.hlis.net

This space for let - please inquire within.


View Profile
Sagamore Hills, Ohio
Posts: 3113
Joined: Dec, 2003
Currently offline offline
  
The Green Fallacy
[#91] Posted: 02/17/2010 - 09:57:02 AM
Reply with Quote
Quote: Originally posted by Caoimhín P. Connell


Look, if you are advocating the stewardship of the Earth, then I’m all on-board. As a Catholic, my church has been advocating stewardship of the Earth and her resources for over 2,000 years. Catholics are the original “Conservationists.” This is old hat, friend.

Cheers!
Caoimhín P. Connell
Forensic Industrial Hygienist
www.forensic-applications.com

(The opinions expressed here are exclusively my personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect my professional opinion, opinion of my employer, agency, peers, or professional affiliates. The above post is for information only and does not reflect professional advice and is not intended to supercede the professional advice of others.)

AMDG



I was baptized Catholic, was an Alter boy for numerous years at St. Bridgett, in Parma, Ohio, and went to more Sunday school than you can shake a stick at.

I, however, don't bring it up at convenient times as to impress the general public and to lend credence to help bolster my position on a certain topic.

You're turning the Catholic religion into a whore -something to help you justify your stance.

Terry



http://www.hlis.net

This space for let - please inquire within.


View Profile
Lafayette, Louisiana
Posts: 3853
Joined: Nov, 2009
Currently offline offline
  
The Green Fallacy
[#92] Posted: 02/17/2010 - 10:01:32 AM
Reply with Quote
Quote: They could have easily pulled the plug stating numerous infractions of forum policy while trying to protect and shelter.


Protect & shelter? Perhaps we should leave that to Mike O. He's good at it and he does it in a civil manner. Nothing wrong with sending him a PM suggesting the censor of a post with inflammatory material.

Marc

"If Guam gets too overpopulated, it might tip over."
Congressman Hank Johnson (D) GA
View Profile
Rochester, New York
Posts: 4114
Joined: Dec, 2003
Currently offline offline
  
The Green Fallacy
[#93] Posted: 02/17/2010 - 10:03:48 AM
Reply with Quote
Honestly, I find the whole thread distasteful. The original post has more sensation than information. I almost nixed it after first read before anyone replied.

It's not really a home inspector issue and it's a Catholic issue even less. I'm disappointed in the pervasive lack of science and logic throughout.

Topics on a home inspector board should be relatively black and white and anything that isn't black and white is probably a vapor diffusion isssue.

Chad Fabry
StructureSmart Home Inspection Rochester, NY
www.structuresmart.com
View Profile
Sagamore Hills, Ohio
Posts: 3113
Joined: Dec, 2003
Currently offline offline
  
The Green Fallacy
[#94] Posted: 02/17/2010 - 10:05:48 AM
Reply with Quote
Quote: Originally posted by Marc

Quote: They could have easily pulled the plug stating numerous infractions of forum policy while trying to protect and shelter.


Protect & shelter? Perhaps we should leave that to Mike O. He's good at it and he does it in a civil manner. Nothing wrong with sending him a PM suggesting the censor of a post with inflammatory material.

Marc


You missed the point Marc.

Terry



http://www.hlis.net

This space for let - please inquire within.


View Profile
Sagamore Hills, Ohio
Posts: 3113
Joined: Dec, 2003
Currently offline offline
  
The Green Fallacy
[#95] Posted: 02/17/2010 - 10:12:48 AM
Reply with Quote
Quote: Originally posted by Chad Fabry

Honestly, I find the whole thread distasteful. The original post has more sensation than information. I almost nixed it after first read before anyone replied.

It's not really a home inspector issue and it's a Catholic issue even less. I'm disappointed in the pervasive lack of science and logic throughout.

Topics on a home inspector board should be relatively black and white.


Chad, I agree but please leave it go on.

All these things that are being discussed were first brought up by Caoimhin.

It's only when people push back that it makes others uneasy. He shouldn't get away with making such broad stroke comments. It's ok to push back.

Also, when intelligent folks Google around they should be able to look at a discussion like this and make up their own mind.

Terry



http://www.hlis.net

This space for let - please inquire within.


View Profile
Lafayette, Louisiana
Posts: 3853
Joined: Nov, 2009
Currently offline offline
  
The Green Fallacy
[#96] Posted: 02/17/2010 - 10:20:22 AM
Reply with Quote
Quote: It's only when people push back that it makes others uneasy. He shouldn't get away with making such broad stroke comments. It's ok to push back.


There's confrontation and there's consultation.

Marc

"If Guam gets too overpopulated, it might tip over."
Congressman Hank Johnson (D) GA
View Profile
Kenmore, WA
Posts: 15393
Joined: Dec, 2003
Currently offline offline
  
The Green Fallacy
[#97] Posted: 02/17/2010 - 10:33:49 AM
Reply with Quote
Even though it is brushing up against religion and politics, I left the thread up because I don't think anyone has crossed the line yet. However, the first time a protestant, jew, muslim, wiccan, druid or any other religion jumps in here and starts arguing about religion and not about global warming or greeniness, or the first time someone gets on here and starts arguing democrat versus republican versus tea party or Obama versus Bush or Reagan or any of that crap, the pruning shears are coming out and I'll either delete the entire thread or cut up the offending post, and any subsequent posts objecting to the pruning shears, and I won't give a rat's ass how loud anyone bellows.

Keep it about the science. If there is proof that global warming is a lie and we can learn about that, let's see it. Just keep the religion and political partisanship out of it. That shouldn't be too hard.

ONE TEAM - ONE FIGHT!!!

Mike

View Profile
Sagamore Hills, Ohio
Posts: 3113
Joined: Dec, 2003
Currently offline offline
  
The Green Fallacy
[#98] Posted: 02/17/2010 - 10:35:00 AM
Reply with Quote
Quote: Originally posted by Marc

Quote: It's only when people push back that it makes others uneasy. He shouldn't get away with making such broad stroke comments. It's ok to push back.


There's confrontation and there's consultation.

Marc


Sorry Jim – You’re on the wrong side of objective facts (again).

Confrontation or consulation Marc?

Terry



http://www.hlis.net

This space for let - please inquire within.


View Profile
Lafayette, Louisiana
Posts: 3853
Joined: Nov, 2009
Currently offline offline
  
The Green Fallacy
[#99] Posted: 02/17/2010 - 10:42:55 AM
Reply with Quote
Confrontation for sure.

My apologies Terance. My post was a suggestion to all members, not just you.

Marc

"If Guam gets too overpopulated, it might tip over."
Congressman Hank Johnson (D) GA
View Profile
Ashland, VA
Posts: 2938
Joined: Jan, 2006
Currently offline offline
  
The Green Fallacy
[#100] Posted: 02/17/2010 - 10:45:11 AM
Reply with Quote
The thread certainly has proved to be a lightning rod, based upon the number of replies and views.


"This above all: to thine own self be true." - William Shakespeare
View Profile
Sagamore Hills, Ohio
Posts: 3113
Joined: Dec, 2003
Currently offline offline
  
The Green Fallacy
[#101] Posted: 02/17/2010 - 10:50:33 AM
Reply with Quote
Quote: Originally posted by mgbinspect

The thread certainly has proved to be a lightning rod, based upon the number of replies and views.




It's OK.... This type of thing is good - it clears the air.

Terry



http://www.hlis.net

This space for let - please inquire within.


 
Previous -  1  2  3  4  5  6  7 - Next 
Previous Topic: Website reference for energy upgrade rebates - Topic - Next Topic: Energy inspections. New TopicReply to TopicShare Topic
Jump To:
The Inspector's Journal Forums © 2002-2013 all topics or replies that are posted on The Inspector's Journal
are copyrighted material of the original author that posted the topic or reply.
Go To Top Of Page 
 
Pick an RSS Feed

The views expressed on this website are the views of the authors and
do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the sponsors.
© 2002-2013 Copyright DevWave Software Inc.
Find a Home Inspector

Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000