| Posted By |
|
|
|
| |
 |
Newberg, OR
Posts: 2786
Joined: Mar, 2007
|  offline
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
Elizabethtown, PA
Posts: 621
Joined: May, 2007
| offline
|
|
Modified Bitumen installation question.
[#2] Posted: 12/07/2009 - 2:57:00 PM |  |  |
|
I would imagine no as this would make it more prone for leakage at the seams, eh?
|
Matthew Steger
WIN
"Common sense is not so common." |
| |
|
|
| | |
|
Wichita, Kansas
Posts: 61
Joined: Nov, 2008
| offline
|
|
|
|
| | |
|
Newberg, OR
Posts: 2786
Joined: Mar, 2007
| offline
|
|
 Modified Bitumen installation question.
[#4] Posted: 12/07/2009 - 5:19:29 PM | | |
|
Ahh. Thanks Erik
So it looks like over 1/2" per foot, they require that it be installed perpendicular to the ridge-- good to know.
Now I'll have to find out if that applies to torch down, or just cold applied methods.
|
Brandon
Portland Home Inspector |
| |
|
|
| | |
|
Wichita, Kansas
Posts: 61
Joined: Nov, 2008
| offline
|
|
|
|
| | |
|
Newberg, OR
Posts: 2786
Joined: Mar, 2007
| offline
|
|
Modified Bitumen installation question.
[#6] Posted: 12/08/2009 - 1:19:01 PM | | |
|
Erik,
I owe you one, oh, make that 2.
Certainteed's directions were one of the sets I read. Don't ask me how I skipped right over the important part I was looking for. I think I'm slipping.
Thanks.
|
Brandon
Portland Home Inspector |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
