The Inspector's Journal Forums
Username:
Password:
Save Password


Join TIJ Forums
Lost Password?
Subscribe to TIJ's Newsletter

All Forums > Technical Forums > Structural Forum >

Joist sistering question

Previous Topic: manufacturing brick - Topic - Next Topic: Concrete Porch New TopicReply to TopicShare Topic
Posted By  
View Profile
Main Line, pa
Posts: 210
Joined: Jan, 2009
Currently offline offline
  
Thread Start First Page
[#1] Posted: 06/01/2010 - 4:00:42 PM
Reply with Quote
Do you guys always write up sisters as inappropriate if they do not span from sill to sill, or sill to beam? I was at a home today with termite damaged joist ends, around 15 of them, all sistered with PT lumber the same size as the damaged joists, bolted, but only maybe 6-8 foot long, where to reach to the beam it would have been about twice that long. It was a crawlspace.

Click to View

59.42 KB

Download Attachment: 100_1484.JPG
509.69 KB

View Profile
Lexington, KY
Posts: 2536
Joined: Nov, 2004
Currently offline offline
  
Joist sistering question
[#2] Posted: 06/01/2010 - 5:48:30 PM
Reply with Quote
I wouldn't complain about those repairs, especially since they're bolted. If the sistered joists were only nailed together, I'd tell someone that bolts or lag screws should be installed, but from what little I can see in your photos, the repairs are okay.
View Profile
Linden, MI
Posts: 225
Joined: Feb, 2004
Currently offline offline
  
Joist sistering question
[#3] Posted: 06/01/2010 - 5:59:07 PM
Reply with Quote
Something does not look right to me. In the first picture, the original joist it crushed about two inches. The band joist also must be seriously damaged. How could they sister in a new joist of the same size without jacking everything up?


Mark Mustola
ValueCheck Home Inspections
Linden, MI
www.ValueCheckInspections.com
View Profile
Louisville, KY
Posts: 1234
Joined: Jan, 2010
Currently offline offline
  
Joist sistering question
[#4] Posted: 06/01/2010 - 6:16:41 PM
Reply with Quote
Quote: Originally posted by MMustola
How could they sister in a new joist of the same size without jacking everything up?


You must not be getting the same wood I buy. Hell, I've had lumber vary as much as a 1/8 lately.

ABI Home Services
Louisville KY Home Inspector
View Profile
State: PA & NJ
Posts: 3208
Joined: Jan, 2004
Currently offline offline
  
Joist sistering question
[#5] Posted: 06/01/2010 - 7:58:07 PM
Reply with Quote
Quote: Originally posted by MMustola

Something does not look right to me. In the first picture, the original joist it crushed about two inches. The band joist also must be seriously damaged. How could they sister in a new joist of the same size without jacking everything up?
I can clearly see the new P/T boards were notched on the bottom edge to fit.

Bill Kibbel, Historic & Commercial Building Inspections - Old House Resources
View Profile
Newberg, OR
Posts: 2784
Joined: Mar, 2007
Currently offline offline
  
Joist sistering question
[#6] Posted: 06/01/2010 - 8:36:17 PM
Reply with Quote
They should have cut out the affected materials during the "repair"

I'd write up that repair as unconventional, and recommend they find out if any permits were pulled for splicing the joists.

Blazenut- those are plain old splices, not a sister. Splices are not covered by the building code and are supposed to be designed.

Brandon

Portland Home Inspector
View Profile
State: PA & NJ
Posts: 3208
Joined: Jan, 2004
Currently offline offline
  
Joist sistering question
[#7] Posted: 06/01/2010 - 10:33:51 PM
Reply with Quote
Quote: Originally posted by Brandon Whitmore

They should have cut out the affected materials during the "repair"

I'd write up that repair as unconventional, and recommend they find out if any permits were pulled for splicing the joists.

Blazenut- those are plain old splices, not a sister. Splices are not covered by the building code and are supposed to be designed.
That's not a splice. They're called scabs. Scabs are also used to reinforce splices. It's a common method of repair for reinforcing damaged ends of joists, where it's not necessary for a full-length sister. I've seen numerous engineered repair designs and engineer approved repairs using this method, when installed with proper through-bolt placement.

I don't know anyone in any municipal building department in my county that wouldn't laugh at someone looking for a permit for repairs, reinforcing or whatever's needed to fix some joists. Maybe it's different up in your corner.

Bill Kibbel, Historic & Commercial Building Inspections - Old House Resources
View Profile
Newberg, OR
Posts: 2784
Joined: Mar, 2007
Currently offline offline
  
Joist sistering question
[#8] Posted: 06/01/2010 - 11:22:28 PM
Reply with Quote
Bill,

I've always called it a splice, and have never been questioned. I'm not doubting you, but do you have something from an authoritative source showing the distinction between a scab and splice? As you say, I've always thought that a scab was the board that tied a splice together.

Either way, it's not covered in the building code, and technically would have to be a designed repair in my opinion. Would I pull permits or hire a design professional for my own place-- no way.

How do you determine when it becomes necessary for a full length sister, placement and number of fasteners, necessary overlap, etc.?

In regards to permits. If the AHJ's laughed me out of their office, I'd kindly request that they change the permit requirements.

For years I struggled with trying to figure out what to write when inspecting this type of repair work. I finally decided that trying to determine whether the repair is adequate is beyond the scope of my inspection. I now say what I see, let them know that it must be a designed repair, should have been permitted, etc.-- it gets me off the hook. I still thoroughly check out the work and often give an opinion as to how well it was done, but tell them I'm not fully qualified for this type of inspection.

Most of the structural "repairs" I see look like a 5th grader designed and implemented the work herself.

Brandon

Portland Home Inspector
View Profile
Kenmore, WA
Posts: 15388
Joined: Dec, 2003
Currently offline offline
  
Joist sistering question
[#9] Posted: 06/02/2010 - 12:06:30 AM
Reply with Quote
Hi,

Here's the problem; the new wood is scabbed onto rotten wood. What friggin' sense does that make?

Here's a quick lesson about rot.

Rot has 3 stages; incipient, intermediate, advanced.

In the incipient stage, the wood looks pretty good and feels pretty good when you probe it or smack it with a hammer; however, rot spore is already in the wood and is moving through the cells like a virus through a bloodstream. I saw something somewhere once - can't remember where - that said that when only 10% of a board is infested with incipient rot it loses 50% of its strength. 50%!!!

In the intermediate stage, the wood starts to look a little "off" - maybe it has a waviness to the surface because the cells inside the wood have begun to shrink from the rot and it Maybe it's soft to the touch and you can dent it just by squeezing hard.

In the advanced state - what you see there in that photo - the wood is seriously damaged by rot and it's strength is a fraction of what it was when it was in the incipient stage - which was already weak.

So, only the end is rotten, right? Wrong; by the time the advanced rot shows up incipient rot has already advanced far far ahead of the leading edge of the advanced rot. It that's a 10 or 12ft. joist, it's probably got incipient rot all the way to the far end and then the middle 40 to 50% is in the intermediate state and the last 10 to 20% has advanced rot. In other words - it's crap and you can't rely on crap to hold bolts.

Termites, annobiidae, lictids, mordoc are all attracted to soft, rotting wood - that's just lunch.

Bolting good wood to the side of that piece of wood was an idiotic thing to do. They should have put a new full-length joist in next to the original, cut out the original, fixed the sill, tapped the new joist into position and then secured it in place.

Never accept sistering where rot is concerned. If you have something with mechanical damage and no rot, sistering will work; however, when there's rot you're just putting a Scooby Doo Bandaid on a severed artery. Don't do it and don't accept it.

ONE TEAM - ONE FIGHT!!!

Mike

View Profile
Lafayette, Louisiana
Posts: 3846
Joined: Nov, 2009
Currently offline offline
  
Joist sistering question
[#10] Posted: 06/02/2010 - 04:25:09 AM
Reply with Quote
I did a little research on Mike's post. So far, I've found the following abstract on a research paper by the US Dept of Agriculture. This is just for your edification:
Quote: Abstract
Early and accurate detection of the extent of fungal deterioration during forensic inspection of the building envelope would eliminate excessive or unnecessary replacement of wood-based building materials. Areas of water infiltration in wood-framed building envelopes in the Pacific Northwest were evaluated visually and sampled for moisture content.
Wood samples were cultured in the laboratory and tested for the presence of decay fungi by the immunodiagnostic wood decay (IWD) test. In oriented strandboard sheathing, a correlation was seen between low moisture content, arrested fungal growth, advanced visual deterioration, and negative IWD results in a building envelope in which advanced fungal decay was discovered 3 years prior to the evaluation.
Evaluation of exterior siding showed a correlation of high moisture content and of swelling and softening of the product with positive IWD results. We conclude that the IWD test should be used to indicate the presence of decay fungi in areas where high moisture content indicates a potential for biodeterioration, since moisture is a precursor for fungal growth.


Marc

"If Guam gets too overpopulated, it might tip over."
Congressman Hank Johnson (D) GA
View Profile
Louisville, KY
Posts: 1234
Joined: Jan, 2010
Currently offline offline
  
Joist sistering question
[#11] Posted: 06/02/2010 - 06:33:09 AM
Reply with Quote
Quote: Originally posted by Brandon Whitmore

Bill,

I've always called it a splice, and have never been questioned. I'm not doubting you, but do you have something from an authoritative source showing the distinction between a scab and splice? As you say, I've always thought that a scab was the board that tied a splice together.



Must be a regional thing, I've always heard them reffered to as a scab.

ABI Home Services
Louisville KY Home Inspector
View Profile
Newberg, OR
Posts: 2784
Joined: Mar, 2007
Currently offline offline
  
Joist sistering question
[#12] Posted: 06/02/2010 - 07:25:41 AM
Reply with Quote
Quote: Must be a regional thing,


Could be ignorance as well. I've used the wrong construction terms before.........

Brandon

Portland Home Inspector
View Profile
Rochester, New York
Posts: 4113
Joined: Dec, 2003
Currently offline offline
  
Joist sistering question
[#13] Posted: 06/02/2010 - 07:51:24 AM
Reply with Quote
http://daveosborne.com/constru...ns.php#S
Chad Fabry
StructureSmart Home Inspection Rochester, NY
www.structuresmart.com
View Profile
Oswego, NY
Posts: 1735
Joined: May, 2008
Currently offline offline
  
Joist sistering question
[#14] Posted: 06/02/2010 - 1:19:31 PM
Reply with Quote
Scab
I'm Gary Blum and I approve this message

www.gtbinspectionservices.com
View Profile
Newberg, OR
Posts: 2784
Joined: Mar, 2007
Currently offline offline
  
Joist sistering question
[#15] Posted: 06/02/2010 - 1:38:22 PM
Reply with Quote
Quote: Scab
A small piece of plywood or lumber, which is fastened over a joint to keep it rigid.


I don't consider the board added to extend the joist a scab, at least based on the above definition. The damaged wood has been cut out or rotted away, so it is now extended with a new board.

New definition for that repair: Joist extension.

Brandon

Portland Home Inspector
View Profile
State: PA & NJ
Posts: 3208
Joined: Jan, 2004
Currently offline offline
  
Joist sistering question
[#16] Posted: 06/02/2010 - 8:41:19 PM
Reply with Quote
Quote: Originally posted by Brandon Whitmore

Bill,

I've always called it a splice, and have never been questioned. I'm not doubting you, but do you have something from an authoritative source showing the distinction between a scab and splice?
Sure. The word has appeared on quite a number of engineer's reports and design repairs, specifically identifying a board added to reinforce a damaged joist or rafter, that does not extend the full length of the member. More often then not, the documents specify the scab is to extend 4' past the damage, split, hole, etc. The term has also been used by structural engineers speaking at conferences, again using it to refer to reinforcement of a damaged or altered structural member.

I've seen the term used the same in many, many publications from respected authors and organizations. I have well over a thousand books, papers and journals published over the past 200 years describing building practices, restorations and repairs. Here's just the first few off the shelf:
Wood-frame House Construction, The Carpenter's Manual, Structural Use of Wood, Successful Restoration, Preserving and Maintaining the Older Home, The Old-House Doctor, Preservation for the Property Owner and Renovation a Complete Guide, all describing the term scab, or "scabbing-on" as a structural repair method of using a short board or even plywood alongside "diseased" or otherwise damaged structural member.

Quite a few of my posts here in the past show that I advocate using correct and accepted terms for building methods and components. I'm quite sure that I've been using the term "scab" correctly, although when I looked it up in the Handbook of Building Terms and Definitions, the only entry for scab was: "An insulting term applied to one who is taking the place of a man on strike".
Quote: For years I struggled with trying to figure out what to write when inspecting this type of repair work. I finally decided that trying to determine whether the repair is adequate is beyond the scope of my inspection. I now say what I see, let them know that it must be a designed repair, should have been permitted, etc.-- it gets me off the hook.
If you're not comfortable, or are not familiar, with what is to some others a common repair, that's probably best. Having seen termite, fire and other damage repairs to joists and rafters on almost every inspection for 25 years, I get to see what works and what hasn't. That, combined with research and working with design professionals for several decades, gives me the confidence to give clients some really useful advice in most cases. I really try to limit statements intended only to get me off the hook.

Bill Kibbel, Historic & Commercial Building Inspections - Old House Resources
View Profile
Newberg, OR
Posts: 2784
Joined: Mar, 2007
Currently offline offline
  
Joist sistering question
[#17] Posted: 06/02/2010 - 9:21:41 PM
Reply with Quote
Bill,

Thanks for the explanation. The reason I requested info. from you is that I couldn't find a great definition of a slab vs. a splice on- line.

Quote: If you're not comfortable, or are not familiar, with what is to some others a common repair, that's probably best.


I'm definitely familiar with the repair. I probably don't see it nearly as often as you, since post and beam construction is the norm. I only see joist construction on the main floor in about a third of my inspections (random guess).

It isn't that I'm not comfortable looking at the repair to decide if it looks OK (usually crap work), it's just that I'm not a paid design professional. I'll voice my opinion of the repair, and leave it to my client to decide if they want to look into it further. Often times, I find minimal overlap, a minimal number of fasteners-- usually nails, and "scissoring" of the joists at the overlap. Basically, it is often really easy to say that it's been poorly repaired.

Quote: I really try to limit statements intended only to get me off the hook.


Poor choice of words on my part.
It comes down to the fact that someone following me on an inspection may make an issue of it, whether or not it looks ok. They could indicate the fact that it should have been designed and permitted, and would be technically correct. I don't want a client calling me up complaining that I didn't let them know.

Thanks Bill.

Brandon

Portland Home Inspector
View Profile
Pearland, Texas
Posts: 153
Joined: Nov, 2006
Currently offline offline
  
Joist sistering question
[#18] Posted: 07/14/2010 - 9:15:28 PM
Reply with Quote
I see a lot of sister bracing, I agree it should be adequate length to allow support, placed over good timbers and bolted in place.
Robert Welch
ATEX Inspects
http://www.atexinspects.com
   
Previous Topic: manufacturing brick - Topic - Next Topic: Concrete Porch New TopicReply to TopicShare Topic
Jump To:
The Inspector's Journal Forums © 2002-2013 all topics or replies that are posted on The Inspector's Journal
are copyrighted material of the original author that posted the topic or reply.
Go To Top Of Page 
 
Pick an RSS Feed

The views expressed on this website are the views of the authors and
do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the sponsors.
© 2002-2013 Copyright DevWave Software Inc.
Find a Home Inspector

Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000