| Posted By |
|
|
|
| |
 Associate Editor - TIJ
    
|
Rochester, New York Posts: 3182
Joined: Dec, 2003
| offline |
|
Thread Start First Page [#1] Posted: Feb 24 2010 - 06:27:55 AM |  | |
|
Court finds that Napadow's right to a speedy trial not violated...
Quote: U.S. v. NAPADOW
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MICHAEL NAPADOW, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-1920.
United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Argued December 4, 2009.
Decided February 23, 2010.
Before POSNER, RIPPLE and WOOD, Circuit Judges.
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.
On April 17, 2008, a federal grand jury returned a six-count indictment charging Michael Napadow with knowingly devising a scheme to defraud and obtain money from home inspectors by selling fraudulent insurance. The indictment contained two counts of wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343 (Counts One and Three), and four counts of mail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (Counts Two, Four, Five and Six). The district court denied his motion to dismiss the indictment for lack of a speedy trial. Mr. Napadow now seeks review of that decision. Because we conclude that the district court was correct, we affirm the judgment.
Read the whole decision.
|
Chad Fabry StructureSmart Home Inspection Rochester, NY www.structuresmart.com
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|