Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'errors and omissions'.



More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Technical Forums
    • Exteriors Forum
    • Landscaping & Site Drainage Forum
    • Roof Forum
    • Plumbing Forum
    • Electrical Forum
    • HVAC Forum
    • Attics & Insulation
    • Foundation Systems Forum
    • Fireplaces, Chimneys & Wood Burning Appliances
    • Interiors & Appliances
    • Swimming Pools and Spas
    • Building Science
    • Green Technologies
    • Pest Control (WDI, WDO and Rodents)
    • Environmental Hazards
    • Indoor Air Quality (I.A.Q.) and Mold Forum
    • Tools & Equipment
    • InfraredThermography
    • Report Writing and the Written Word
    • Computers & Reporting Systems Forum
    • Free Downloads and Online Training Resources
  • Business Forums
    • Marketing Techniques
    • Insurance Questions
    • Bare Bones Biz Money Making Q & A
    • 203(k) Consultants & FHA Inspectors
    • Help Wanted - Businesses For Sale
    • For Sale or Swap
  • H.I. Associations, Training, and Licensing Issues
    • Professional Home Inspection Associations
    • Home Inspection Licensing and Pending/Legislation
  • Miscellaneous Discussion Forums
    • Open Discussion Forum (Chit-Chat)
    • Open Topics
    • Architectural Nightmares and Remuddles
    • Inspecting/Appreciating Old Homes
    • International Home Inspector Issues
    • Feedback For TIJ
    • Help Using TIJ Forums
  • TIJ's News You Can Use
    • News Around The Net
    • Inspector Rants!
    • Safety Alerts/Health Advisories
    • The Latest Reviews For Home Inspectors
    • New Product Forum
    • Product Recalls
    • Site Announcements
  • Make Your Publication Submissions Here
  • Home Inspector Polls
    • Professional Practices Polls

Blogs

  • The Latest News For Home Inspectors

Categories

  • Air Conditioning Systems
  • Appliances
  • Building Science
  • Drainage & Landscaping
  • Electrical Systems
  • Exteriors
  • Foundations
  • Garages & Carports
  • Heat Pumps
  • Heating Systems
  • Historical Structures
  • Inspecting...
  • Installation Guides
  • Insulation
  • Interiors
  • Pests & Rot
  • Plumbing
  • Porches, Decks & Balconies
  • Professional Practices
  • Reports
  • Roofs
  • Software
  • Structure
  • Ventilation Systems
  • Indoor Air Quality & Mold

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


About


Location


Website


Occupation


FACEBOOK


TWITTER


SKYPE


YOUTUBE


GOOGLEPLUS

Found 2 results

  1. Hi TIJ Readers! Happy New Year! And Happy National Radon Action Month! With the growing interest in radon inspections among the inspection community, we decided to kick off the year by interviewing 10 inspectors that offer radon testing. They share why they test, what investments they make to test, and how they manage risk. See an excerpt below. Best, Stephanie Radon inspections: What you need to know Radon: the colorless, odorless gas emitted into the air by the radioactive element, radium, as it breaks down in soil, rock, and water. Typically, radon penetrates buildings through small cracks or openings in foundations undetected. And, once radon has entered a property, the radon may be trapped inside. In fact, this is what home inspectors test in their radon inspections. More statistical evidence may be necessary to fully understand the causal relationship between radon and lung cancer (more below). However, the EPA continues to characterize radon as a cause for concern. In 2017, the EPA designated January as National Radon Action Month, encouraging observers to "Test, Fix, Save a Life." Since testing is the only way to determine a home's radon levels, the EPA and Surgeon General recommend that home buyers, sellers, and remodelers test all homes below the third floor. If consumers discover elevated radon levels of four picocuries per liter (4 pCi/L) or higher?which the EPA estimates that nearly one in every 15 households do?then the EPA urges them to take corrective measures, including the installation of a radon-reduction system. Many national and local governments encourage and, in some cases, even mandate radon testing during real estate transactions. This has led many home inspectors to offer radon testing as an additional service. In fact, over a quarter (25 percent) of the inspectors we insure carry the radon endorsement. This implies that just as many inspectors currently offer radon testing in the market at large. (More on endorsements later.) In this article, we explore why 10 home inspectors chose to offer radon testing and what recommendations they have for home inspectors considering offering the additional service. Why inspectors test for radon. When asked why they offer radon testing, the 10 home inspectors we surveyed said that they began offering the service for one or more of the following reasons: 1. They wanted to protect clients from potential lung cancer risks. The labels "silent killer" and "cancer-causing radioactive gas" characterize public opinion and discourse regarding radon. But how did radon amass such a bad reputation? While researchers studied radon?s effects on miners for decades prior, testing within homes began in Pennsylvania in 1984. While entering the Limerick Nuclear Power Plant, which was under construction, an engineer named Stanley Watras tripped a radiation detector. This monitor measured unsafe radiation levels for plant workers. Three things stood out to safety officials: When he set the monitor off, Watras was coming to, not going from, the Plant. Due to the construction, the Plant was not currently operating. No other workers were contaminated. Based on the evidence above, Plant officials were certain that Watras had not been exposed to the radon at work. So, the officials took measurements of the Watras' home. To their alarm, they discovered radiation levels more than 200,000 times above the level permissible for people living close to nuclear power plants. Believing that Watras' exposure to radon in his home may not be uncommon, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) conducted a survey of 10 states that volunteered. During the 1986 survey, the EPA tested 11,600 homes for radon. The results: one of every five homes tested contained health-threatening radon levels. The EPA declared radon a national problem. [READ MORE]
  2. Hi TIJ Readers! Wondering how you can better prevent claims? Or what it would be like to have a claim? To try to help answer these questions, we publish details from actual home inspection insurance claims every few months. We hope you enjoy our latest case study. Best, Stephanie The Sinking Yard: A Home Inspection Insurance Claim The following is a real home inspector case study from our insurance claim archives. In order to protect the insured's identity, all identifiable characteristics?including names, associations, and locations?have been omitted or removed. "You have been sued. You may employ an attorney. If you or your attorney do not file a written answer with the clerk who issued this citation by 10:00 a.m. on the Monday next following the expiration of twenty days after you were served this citation and petition, a default judgment may be taken against you." That was how home inspector Nathan Cross' letter from the state began. According to the state, former home inspection clients Patrick and Miranda Spence were suing Cross and the sellers for "deceptive trade practices," "breach of contract," "economic and actual damages," and "intentional damages by omissions." The Complaint Unbeknownst to Cross, the property used to have a swimming pool. The sellers had filled the pool in and covered it up prior to putting the house on the market. The sellers did not disclose the pool's existence to either the Spences nor Cross. So, when Cross performed his inspection, there were no visible signs of a pool in the backyard, nor were there any visible defects. Thus, Cross' inspection report did not indicate any issues in the backyard. About a year after the inspection, indentations began to appear in the backyard. Upon investigating the property's tax records, the Spences discovered that a pool had existed prior to them moving in. (The covered pool was not in the sellers' disclosure.) They surmised that the sellers must have improperly filled the pool, which led to developing indentations. Now, a full year and a half after Cross' inspection, the Spences were taking legal action. The Spences demanded "monetary relief of $100,000 or less, including damages of any kind, penalties, costs, expenses, pre-judgment interest, and attorney fees." [READ MORE]
×
×
  • Create New...