Bain Posted September 24, 2008 Report Share Posted September 24, 2008 I'm currently inside a house that has no felt underlayment beneath the asphalt shingles. The bloody things were nailed directly onto the OSB decking. I realize there's no code in place barring this practice, but does anyone know if manufacturers as a group require felt beneath the shingles? Many insurance companies require felt to maintain fire ratings, and won't pay a claim on a fire-damaged house with no underlayment, but I don't have tons of time to Google here while I'm on-site. Any help would be appreciated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caryseidner Posted September 24, 2008 Report Share Posted September 24, 2008 Yea I'm sure they all do, as well as the NRCA. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Raymond Posted September 24, 2008 Report Share Posted September 24, 2008 Page 1 in the Certainteed Installation Instructions (see link) recommends underlayment for all shingled roofs, but only requires underlayment for shallow pitches. http://www.certainteed.com/NR/rdonlyres ... l8Ch13.pdf Tom Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bain Posted September 24, 2008 Author Report Share Posted September 24, 2008 Thanks, Tom. I have a few installation .pdfs on my computer, and the word "recommend" was in all of them. I wanted to make certain that the standard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandon Whitmore Posted September 24, 2008 Report Share Posted September 24, 2008 Section R905 shows underlayment as being required in the '06 IRC for asphalt shingles. (R905.2.7) Just checked out the NRCA for you and they recommend it (for code reasons, insurance reasons, etc.) (page 330 on the on- line NRCA manual) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Katen Posted September 24, 2008 Report Share Posted September 24, 2008 Originally posted by Bain I'm currently inside a house that has no felt underlayment beneath the asphalt shingles. The bloody things were nailed directly onto the OSB decking. I realize there's no code in place barring this practice, but does anyone know if manufacturers as a group require felt beneath the shingles? Many insurance companies require felt to maintain fire ratings, and won't pay a claim on a fire-damaged house with no underlayment, but I don't have tons of time to Google here while I'm on-site. Any help would be appreciated. The NRCA recommends it in section 2.2. You can view the manual online here: http://www.nrca.net/rp/technical/manual/manual.aspx - Jim Katen, Oregon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chad Fabry Posted September 24, 2008 Report Share Posted September 24, 2008 I may be mistaken but it's my belief that the current IRC requires an underlayment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Katen Posted September 24, 2008 Report Share Posted September 24, 2008 Originally posted by Chad Fabry I may be mistaken but it's my belief that the current IRC requires an underlayment. The only requirement I see is that double underlayment is required from 2:12 up to 4:12. - Jim Katen, Oregon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Kibbel Posted September 24, 2008 Report Share Posted September 24, 2008 "R905.2.7 Underlayment application. For roof slopes from two units vertical in 12 units horizontal (17-percent slope), up to four units vertical in 12 units horizontal (33-percent slope), underlayment shall be two layers applied in the following manner. Apply a 19-inch (483 mm) strip of underlayment felt parallel to and starting at the eaves, fastened sufficiently to hold in place. Starting at the eave, apply 36-inch-wide (914 mm) sheets of underlayment, overlapping successive sheets 19 inches (483 mm), and fastened sufficiently to hold in place. Distortions in the underlayment shall not interfere with the ability of the shingles to seal. ***For roof slopes of four units vertical in 12 units horizontal (33-percent slope) or greater, underlayment shall be one layer applied in the following manner. Underlayment shall be applied shingle fashion, parallel to and starting from the eave and lapped 2 inches (51 mm), fastened sufficiently to hold in place." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Katen Posted September 24, 2008 Report Share Posted September 24, 2008 Originally posted by inspecthistoric "R905.2.7 Underlayment application. For roof slopes from two units vertical in 12 units horizontal (17-percent slope), up to four units vertical in 12 units horizontal (33-percent slope), underlayment shall be two layers applied in the following manner. Apply a 19-inch (483 mm) strip of underlayment felt parallel to and starting at the eaves, fastened sufficiently to hold in place. Starting at the eave, apply 36-inch-wide (914 mm) sheets of underlayment, overlapping successive sheets 19 inches (483 mm), and fastened sufficiently to hold in place. Distortions in the underlayment shall not interfere with the ability of the shingles to seal. ***For roof slopes of four units vertical in 12 units horizontal (33-percent slope) or greater, underlayment shall be one layer applied in the following manner. Underlayment shall be applied shingle fashion, parallel to and starting from the eave and lapped 2 inches (51 mm), fastened sufficiently to hold in place." Ah, so. Thanks. - Jim Katen, Oregon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bain Posted September 24, 2008 Author Report Share Posted September 24, 2008 Thanks for the quick replies, everyone. I loathe the gray areas of our bidness where something is performed at a bare minimum level of acceptance, but you can't actually call it wrong. I mean, what if the shingles were installed during the winter and they didn't seal properly? Rain would slant in through the gaps and destroy the decking. FYI, the undersides of the decking were pristine in the attic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerry Simon Posted September 24, 2008 Report Share Posted September 24, 2008 Can any of our Wisconsin folk verify that felt is not a requirement in their lovely state? Think I heard this was a newer-something *less-requirement* as of couple/few years ago. If so, seems weird for a state where the most oft-heard last words of the males inhabiting the great north woods are "hold my beer and watch this..." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carle3 Posted September 25, 2008 Report Share Posted September 25, 2008 Originally posted by Jerry Simon Can any of our Wisconsin folk verify that felt is not a requirement in their lovely state? Think I heard this was a newer-something *less-requirement* as of couple/few years ago. If so, seems weird for a state where the most oft-heard last words of the males inhabiting the great north woods are "hold my beer and watch this..." (3) WATER. All roofs shall be designed and constructed to assure drainage of water. (a) Roofing. 1. ââ¬ËGeneral.ââ¬â¢ a. Underlayment consisting of number 15 asphalt#8722;impregnated felt paper or equivalent or other type I material that shows no water transmission when tested in accordance with ASTM D 226 or ASTM D 4869 shall be provided under shingles.Note: Underlayment materials meeting the requirements of ASTM D 1970 meet the performance requirements of this section. b. Fasteners shall be corrosion resistant We do not fall under the IRC. We have are own code section that is a derivative of the IRC the UDC. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgclancy Posted September 26, 2008 Report Share Posted September 26, 2008 Here in Minnesota not only is the underlayment needed but there is also the requirement ( I won't go into the exact math) that the first several feet is Rain & Ice Shield. They even have it written on the work permit that has to be displayed in the window. Jim C. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgclancy Posted October 10, 2008 Report Share Posted October 10, 2008 I also wish to stress that local codes throughout the USA vary immensely with regard to underlayment. In reality, felt underlayment is not a moisture barrier in regards to manufacturers warranty. Felt under shingles is not considered a moisture barrier.Felt can be a temporary moisture barrier, if secured properly, before the application of shingles. Once shingles are applied the felt is no longer a moisture barrier. Jim C. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.