jodil Posted October 16, 2008 Report Share Posted October 16, 2008 I have a furious homeowner who is claiming that his subpanel in his garage is not a "subpanel." There is one meter and he claims that both panels (house panel and garage panel) both have sep. feeds off the meter. Can this be right? thanks, Jodi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jodil Posted October 16, 2008 Author Report Share Posted October 16, 2008 Originally posted by jodil I have a furious homeowner who is claiming that his subpanel in his garage is not a "subpanel." There is one meter and he claims that both panels (house panel and garage panel) both have sep. feeds off the meter. Can this be right? thanks, Jodi And if this was the case, how could I tell? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandon Whitmore Posted October 16, 2008 Report Share Posted October 16, 2008 Yes, that is quite possible. It would be like a large home where you have 2x 200 amp panels (total of 400 amp service to the home) run off of the same meter. You can usually tell by checking each panel. If you don't see feeder wires (labeled or not) run to the other panel, that should tell you power is coming from elsewhere...... such as from the meter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jodil Posted October 16, 2008 Author Report Share Posted October 16, 2008 Originally posted by Brandon Whitmore Yes, that is quite possible. It would be like a large home where you have 2x 200 amp panels (total of 400 amp service to the home) run off of the same meter. You can usually tell by checking each panel. If you don't see feeder wires (labeled or not) run to the other panel, that should tell you power is coming from elsewhere...... such as from the meter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Katen Posted October 16, 2008 Report Share Posted October 16, 2008 Originally posted by jodil Originally posted by jodil I have a furious homeowner who is claiming that his subpanel in his garage is not a "subpanel." There is one meter and he claims that both panels (house panel and garage panel) both have sep. feeds off the meter. Can this be right? thanks, Jodi And if this was the case, how could I tell? Certainly it's possible. It's actually rather common in my area. To tell, you'd have to follow the feeders. Of course, each panel has to be listed for use as service equipment. The sorry news for your homeowner is that all of the main disconnects (up to six are allowed) have to be grouped together in one location - 225.33. - Jim Katen, Oregon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jodil Posted October 16, 2008 Author Report Share Posted October 16, 2008 So Jim, Does this mean there cannot be a main disconnect at the garage panel and another main disconnect in the house panel? Cuz thats how it currently is wired. Im going back out there tonight to eat crow... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Katen Posted October 16, 2008 Report Share Posted October 16, 2008 Originally posted by jodil So Jim, Does this mean there cannot be a main disconnect at the garage panel and another main disconnect in the house panel? Cuz thats how it currently is wired. Im going back out there tonight to eat crow... Tough position. You've got to approach him with your hat in your hand and then point out that the situation is wrong for a different reason. He'll react badly because, in his mind, you already lost credibility. Yes. In a single family dwelling, there's no question that all of the main disconnects are supposed to be grouped in the same location. I've seen situations where the AHJ allowed this if each disconnect had a permanently mounted sign explaining where the other disconnect was, but that was in commercial buildings. There's really no excuse for this kind of gaffe in a house. The proper solution would probably be to install a main disconnect at the meter. - Jim Katen, Oregon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Raymond Posted October 16, 2008 Report Share Posted October 16, 2008 The proper solution would probably be to install a main disconnect at the meter. And then wire each panel as subs. Tom Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Katen Posted October 16, 2008 Report Share Posted October 16, 2008 Originally posted by Tom Raymond The proper solution would probably be to install a main disconnect at the meter. And then wire each panel as subs. Tom Just so. - Jim Katen, Oregon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim H Posted October 16, 2008 Report Share Posted October 16, 2008 Originally posted by Jim Katen Originally posted by jodil So Jim, Does this mean there cannot be a main disconnect at the garage panel and another main disconnect in the house panel? Cuz thats how it currently is wired. Im going back out there tonight to eat crow... Tough position. You've got to approach him with your hat in your hand and then point out that the situation is wrong for a different reason. He'll react badly because, in his mind, you already lost credibility. Yes. In a single family dwelling, there's no question that all of the main disconnects are supposed to be grouped in the same location. I've seen situations where the AHJ allowed this if each disconnect had a permanently mounted sign explaining where the other disconnect was, but that was in commercial buildings. There's really no excuse for this kind of gaffe in a house. The proper solution would probably be to install a main disconnect at the meter. - Jim Katen, Oregon Jodi, I am guesing that the homeowner is the seller and you did the inspection for a buyer? Is the homeowner your client? If not, should you tell him about the problem with 225.33. before telling your client about the error(s) and sending them an ammended report (and letting them decide whether to mention it or not)? I can see talking to the homeowner about the findings on your original report (assuming the client released the report to him), but wouldn't you need your clients permission to mention the 225.33. issue? Or, I am overthinking the entire thing? Good luck. Screwing up sucks, but we have all done it. Tim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inspector57 Posted October 18, 2008 Report Share Posted October 18, 2008 Why is he furious? Did you call for repairs that will cost him money or is this just a question of semantics? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.