srowe
-
Posts
3 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Articles
News for Home Inspectors
Events
Blogs
Gallery
Store
Downloads
Everything posted by srowe
-
Don't hold back Jim , tell us how you really feel?[:-slaphap Thanks Jim for your comments. I think you have made some assumptions about how the heater was inspected or what techniques were used. The burner photo could have been submitted in a digital photo but it would not have illustrated it as clearly as the IR. Nevertheless, I don't see how the IR "clouds" anything, in fact, I thinks it paints the picture quite clearly. Ok, maybe it was a silly question to ask and I shouldn't have questioned my judgement. I had just gotten the call back from the angry seller that there is nothing wrong with the heater. I just wanted to make sure that I wasn't missing something.
-
I guess I am looking for validation of my interpretation. Which is to be that "it ain't working right". I was a little dumbfounded when the owner said the pool contractor ok'd everything. The IR camera showed me something I didn't expect to see. Other comments please!
-
Need some help interpreting the photo. This is a thermal image I took of a Hayward Pool Heater (2001). I ran the heater in both pool heat and spa heat mode. It appears that only three of the burners were working. According to the seller, his pool contractor said that everything was working fine. Again, the seller called me to tell me this. Is there something that I am missing with this picture? Download Attachment: IR_0081.jpg 121.66 KB