randynavarro Posted September 10, 2008 Report Share Posted September 10, 2008 Anyone seen this type of wear? Just plain ole deterioration? Defective product? Image Insert: 154.08 KB Image Insert: 154.63 KB Image Insert: 152.47 KB Image Insert: 151.97 KB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandon Whitmore Posted September 10, 2008 Report Share Posted September 10, 2008 Looks like a built up roof where they forgot to put the tar on it? What's the roof slope on that thing? It looks like it has a pretty steep slope for a flat roof membrane. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven Hockstein Posted September 10, 2008 Report Share Posted September 10, 2008 Wrong product. Brandon got it right. I think you could use standard shingles but if if the pitch is too low for shingles it should be this type roof or equal from another manufacturer: http://www.gaf.com/Content/Documents/20801.pdf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
msteger Posted September 10, 2008 Report Share Posted September 10, 2008 Is it me, or does it look like the seams run up the field and not across it? In the 2nd photo, are we looking down the slope? Definitely looks like a roof install that needs to be called out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hausdok Posted September 11, 2008 Report Share Posted September 11, 2008 Hi, It's a glass mat isolation membrane that's being used as a cover. The cheap SOB's way of putting on a low-pitch cover and even when new with a fresh coating of asphalt is a piece of crap that has an expected service life (according to Jorve roofing) of about 7 years, tops. It'll probably be worn out before the ink on your report is dry. ONE TEAM - ONE FIGHT!!! Mike Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BornaRoofer Posted September 11, 2008 Report Share Posted September 11, 2008 Theres a old modified system called derbigum that looks like that when it gets old and doesnt get coated. Any idea how old it is? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kurt Posted September 12, 2008 Report Share Posted September 12, 2008 Interesting. Derbigum. I've never been able to find the name of that stuff. There were a number of these installed on large apt. buildings in Chicago in the late '70's, mid-80's, invariably by slumlord creeps and condo conversion weasels. If you lean on them, you get more glass fibers in your hands and forearms than you can imagine. I hate the stuff, but if it's kept coated, it can keep the water out. POS stuff, though. Chris, do you have your own shop, or work for someone (Sheriff-Goslin)? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandon Whitmore Posted September 12, 2008 Report Share Posted September 12, 2008 Derbigum (at least todays material) looks like the standard modified bitumen product. It must take a lot of wear to show like the one on this post............... http://www.derbigum.com/US/US_products_derbigum.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BornaRoofer Posted September 12, 2008 Report Share Posted September 12, 2008 I believe derbigum has been bought and sold a few times over the years and Owens corning was or is one of these owners and that would explain all the glass in the sheet. Kurt, I'm Technical rep for Firestone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caryseidner Posted September 15, 2008 Report Share Posted September 15, 2008 Derbigum is (or at least was) considered a "premium" mod bit. I've toured their plant and it's pretty cool to see how that stuff is made. An earlier version of their product had a polyester/fiberglass scrim laid in the top third of the sheet and we used to see it coming through all the time. They always said it was normal and not an issue, and I don't remember ever observing a leaking condition due to the sheet. It does look sick as hell though. When I first saw Randy's photos that was the first thing I thought. Derbigum. But photo 3 looks more like a thinner base ply sheet, and not a mod bit, to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hausdok Posted September 15, 2008 Report Share Posted September 15, 2008 Hi, It's exactly what I said it was. I know, 'cuz I see the stuff all the time. It's roughly 1/40th of an inch thick. They usually lay down some mastic, roll this stuff out into the mastic and swab on a thin layer of mastic and call it a day. Like I said, one of the most reputable roofing companies around here says that it'll last 7 years if they're real lucky. OT - OF!!! M. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed the Roofer Posted September 20, 2008 Report Share Posted September 20, 2008 First photo looked like Derbi-Gum we were applying in the mid to late 70's at Hans Rosenow Roofing in Chicago. Then, the other shots showed it was a fiberglass felt applied with either hot tar, but probably more likely and adhesive mastic with a squeegee (sp). Wrong material for the job. Vertical seams on a properly installed Built Up Roof is an acceptable manner of application. Also, look at all of those Polish Bungalows in Chicago with 90# Roll Roofing face nailed on the seams installed vertically. Ed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.