Let me gently offer: If the NEC is going to require AFCIs, and TREC is going to require that you "write up" TX houses without AFCIs, do you really want to tell clients that "this is not a large safety concern?" That's a hard -- well, impossible -- position to back up. If, heaven forbid, a house you inspected burns down, what will you say when it comes time to back up your "not a large safety concern" statement? Why not just tell the customers what NEC and TREC say, and let NEC and TREC hold the hot potato(es)? Why offer a personal opinion when citing respected authorities would work better? WJ Should I also tell them that 14 gauge wire is no longer allowed in their jurisdiction? Should I have them install the new tamper resistent receptacles? Should I apologize to them because I have to rip off a shingle to see the nailing pattern (a new TREC rule)? Why don't I write it up if in their 20 year old house their smoke alarms are not wired together? I do explain to them the reason behind the 2008 NEC AFCI requirement. The problem with the rule is that I am required to write this particular "code violation" on every house no matter when it was built. Inspectors have said for years that they are not code inspectors and I avoid that word as much as I can. I do not think this "write-up" makes the house any safer but it does put concern in the buyer's mind. I guess my problem is why did TREC pick this one particular code area to singlke out. It is also impossible to retrofit many panels with AFCIs.