mikeowen Posted November 21, 2010 Report Posted November 21, 2010 Has anyone tried either of these models and if so what did you think? looking for an entry level type camera, any suggestions?
palmettoinspect Posted November 22, 2010 Report Posted November 22, 2010 Mike, I have an Extech i5. It’s my first and only infrared camera. The resolution is 80x80 and is really bad. Honestly you can hardly tell what you’re looking at unless there’s a very distinctive object in the frame. Does it work? Yes, it does work. If you are using it as a part of your normal home inspection to confirm leaks, wonder if there is a gap or missing insulation in the wall it’s great. I’ve found many leaks and lots of missing insulation etc. Along with good knowledge of a building and what areas to look and find leaks it’s pretty easy to use and a great tool to have. I couldn’t tell you how it would compare to a camera with 120x120 resolution like the i7 has but from my understanding 120x120 is the minimum that’s recommended. The better the resolution is, the clearer and better the infrared image is to understand. In conclusion if you can snag one for under $1000 do it. If you are looking at buying new then I would go for something with a better resolution. My camera paid for its self very quickly. It’s a great marketing tool that set you aside from the next guy. Hope this helps. Kiel Allen
hausdok Posted November 22, 2010 Report Posted November 22, 2010 Hi, If you're looking for a higher resolution entry-level camera but aren't necessarily interested in getting picture-in-picture, IR Fusion, TwinPix or whatever else it's being called, you might check out the Testo 875-1 (Around $2800). ONE TEAM - ONE FIGHT!!! Mike
Mark P Posted November 22, 2010 Report Posted November 22, 2010 Resolution is not the only consideration, but 120x120 is the minimum for our job; you'll also want to compare the thermal sensitivity. I've learned alot at http://www.thesnellgroup.com/irtalk/
kurt Posted November 22, 2010 Report Posted November 22, 2010 You really want better resolution. 120x120 is the barest minimum. I can't imagine trying to figure some of this stuff out on 80x80 rez. Some of the anomalies are so very fine tuned, it just doesn't read satisfactorily on the lower resolution. The pic in pic stuff is really nice for lower resolutions. With higher resolution equipment and the right palette, you don't really need the Fusion thing; the picture is good enough, you can tell what you're looking at.
mikeowen Posted November 22, 2010 Author Report Posted November 22, 2010 Thanks for all your help. The comments and feedback are helpful. I think will take a webinar class and in the meantime decide how I am going to incorporate this into my inspection business. I have been doing inspections for a long time but this is all new to me. Thanks again.
robert1966 Posted January 5, 2011 Report Posted January 5, 2011 I have a FLIR I7 and I have been happy with it so far. It gives me just what I need in infrared scanning.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now