Jump to content

Adding new gas line & pressure test causes leaks?


Nolan Kienitz

Recommended Posts

Interesting situation I'm experiencing:

Plumber adding gas line for a cooktop being changed from electric to NG.

Single-story house built in 1982.

Black iron gas distribution. Meter in alley, gas entrance to house about 40-feet run underground. Underground feeder may be poly with iron risers ... will learn for sure today.

Extension to cooktop is also black iron.

Local AHJ requires a higher pressure test with system changes ... not a bad thing.

Pressure test not holding and plumber is finding that some of the old/original connections seeping. Has been segmented (so far) with leaks at underground feeder at in-house distribution.

Higher PSI possibly blowing past some old connections. (supposedly)

Will be learning more as more testing begins anew today.

Any wise thoughts from the massive experience here at TIJ?

BTW - Yes, this is my home.

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

UPDATE: Gas line repairs at my house

Poly connection to bottom of riser (at house) is/was leaking. Typical riser with black tape wrap on riser, over coupling and poly. Leak right at poly and coupling.

Riser also had small diameter pipe as support from original construction that was a water conduit along and to bottom of black iron riser wrapped in tape that also has rusted. Support pipe was just under roof eave where runoff would almost hit it directly. (Think about it ... how many times do we see that?)

New 'weather-sealed' riser with longer horizontal stem is being installed to replace defective. Here's hoping the other end at the meter is still OK. At least it is not under the eave of the roof, but still has the hollow pipe for support of the original riser.

One great learning experience, but my checkbook is likely going to hurt when it is all over.

Gas leak is at poly to coupling:

Click to Enlarge
tn_20121130134656_IMGP4993.jpg

60.89 KB

New riser being installed:

Click to Enlarge
tn_20121130134811_IMGP4996.jpg

66.04 KB

Hollow pipe along riser at meter:

Click to Enlarge
tn_2012113013495_IMGP4997.jpg

84.16 KB

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is the required test pressure?

Usually, the required standard pressure ("w.c.) test pressure is only 10#'s for 15 min, but most guys around here pump up to 25'ish pounds, and I rarely see a leak.

I witness and sign off on the gas line pressure tests at times, but don't have any experience with re- pressure testing older lines. There's no requirement to re- test them around here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is the required test pressure?

Usually, the required standard pressure ("w.c.) test pressure is only 10#'s for 15 min, but most guys around here pump up to 25'ish pounds, and I rarely see a leak.

I witness and sign off on the gas line pressure tests at times, but don't have any experience with re- pressure testing older lines. There's no requirement to re- test them around here.

BW -

Turns out they use same values here.

Plumber did run pressure up to 25+ when he happened across some seepage in a legacy connection from when the house was built in 1982. He started to get a tad worried as he has seen some situations over the years where there had been a mess of leaks in some legacy properties.

He segmented the system and then also found the underground failure at the riser/poly connection where it comes up to enter the home (as noted ... our meter is in the alley about 40' distant).

City of Plano (AHJ) requires pressure test on situations such as our case where a new line was being installed for an appliance (in our case a cook-top).

Actually with any appliance change (water heater, furnace) and adding a line for an appliance the AHJ would have also required the plumber to install sediment traps at the W/H and furnace if they were not present. They also check the appliances for adequate combustion air and proper venting ... if not present you get 'red-tagged' until updated.

This is interesting to see and hear about as a few years ago the City of Plano AHJ could have cared less about 'sediment traps'. Interesting how the pendulum swings.

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...