Does Spleling really count?

[StevenT]

Aoccdrnig to rscheearch at Cmabrigde uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are. The olny ipmarotnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteres are at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a tatol mses and you can siltl raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae we do not raed ervey lteter by istlef but the wrod as a wlohe.

[John Dirks Jr]

Amazing! I was able to read that without any problems. Hmmm....

[hausdok]

Yeah,

We've seen that before. It's a neat trick but it still doesn't make careless spelling acceptable in a professionally written document.

I dare you to try that with German using modal verbs.

ONE TEAM - ONE FIGHT!!!

Mike

[Jim Katen]

Try typing like that in the address bar of your web browser.

- Jim Katen, Oregon

[aaronm]

Originally posted by hausdok

I dare you to try that with German using modal verbs.

Mike

You mean like this:

Re neischen, ned uz nut?

Es geht . . .fast.

Aaron

[hausdok]

Fast?

Nein, das glaube ich nicht. Bei Mir, bedeudet's gar Nichts - nur Kwatch. Also, Ich meine, z.b. "sich schlafen, sich standen, ...." Veileicht auf English geht's, aber, beim anderen Sprachen? Kaum..

OT - OF!!!

M.

Almost? No, I don't believe that. To me it meant nothing - only garbage. Besides, I mean, for instance, "(examples of modal verbs)." Maybe it works in English, but in other languages? Hardly..

[aaronm]

Aber ganau wie ich sagte, es geht, fast.

Aaron

[fqp25]

Would you stop?

Image Insert:

181.83 KB

[randynavarro]

Originally posted by aaronm

Aber ganau wie ich sagte, es geht, fast.

Aaron

Stop it. Both of you -- right now.