Chad Fabry Posted February 24, 2010 Report Share Posted February 24, 2010 Court finds that Napadow's right to a speedy trial not violated... U.S. v. NAPADOW UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MICHAEL NAPADOW, Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-1920. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued December 4, 2009. Decided February 23, 2010. Before POSNER, RIPPLE and WOOD, Circuit Judges. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge. On April 17, 2008, a federal grand jury returned a six-count indictment charging Michael Napadow with knowingly devising a scheme to defraud and obtain money from home inspectors by selling fraudulent insurance. The indictment contained two counts of wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343 (Counts One and Three), and four counts of mail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (Counts Two, Four, Five and Six). The district court denied his motion to dismiss the indictment for lack of a speedy trial. Mr. Napadow now seeks review of that decision. Because we conclude that the district court was correct, we affirm the judgment. Read the whole decision. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.