In my opinion ASHI has serious problems with its political structure and some of its policys. During the debate over Branding the dividing line between those in favor and those opposed fell almost exactly along the lines of who did and did not have an ASHI title under their name. Membership was indifferent at best, violently opposed at worst. Leadership didn't care. When told by consultants that losses could run 30%, they forged ahead anyway. I'm totally unable understand how they could rationalize the prospect of such significant losses as the elected representatives of ALL members, including the 30% they were willing to jettison. Some parts of the program are good (IMHO). The new website and more aggressive internet presence were overdue. I would have paid the increase for that alone. But ASHI should be quietly moving away from realtors, not towards them, with the ultimate aim of cutting them out of our business equation altogether. The aim of dominating local markets to the point where one must be ASHI in order to work is repugnant, in my view. Monopolies are never in the best interests of anyone, not even the monopolizing party in the long run. Given that ASHI is unable to effectively police its members (for whatever reason), there would surely be more than a few who would join, work to meet the minimum requirements, and then set off on an endless, profitable run of substandard work that would embarass us all. The "Special Forces" metality that appealed to me has been supplanted by a desire to be overwhelmingly huge and powerful, ultimately to the benefit of ASHI national and the detriment of the individual ASHI member. I pray for the return of the ASHI where excellence was top priority, not sales. The creme of the crop, not the whole damned harvest. All my personal opinion. Brian G.