By providing the hour-by-hour readings, you give the client more information, which does sometimes end up having to answer more questions. I don't necessarily see that as a bad thing since we are in the business of providing people info. I had a home that had an average of 3.8 but half of the hourly readings (this was on a 96 hour test) were over 4.0, some as high as 8. The client decided to have the home mitigated even though the total average number was under 4.0. They made that decision based on the chart info. So, another home is mitigated, readings after mitigation were 1.3, all hourly readings were under 4.0, is that somehow a bad thing? Personally, I think too many people, and Realtors, get hung up on the 4.0 is dangerous but 3.9 is not. That's like saying smoking 18 cigarettes a day is ok, but the full 20 of a pack is not. And yes, when I had an EKG, I asked to see the tape and made the Doctor explain what it all meant.