I think part of the problem is the dichotomy of viewpoints. One side says "just report the bad stuff" those of us in the real world try to word things to accurately relate the problems to our client without the "sky is falling" diction. I often report things like "generally the fascia is in good condition, however, there is some dryrot at the southwest corner. Replacement of moisture damaged wood is recommended". I am not afraid to report something in good condition. Compare this to "Southwest corner of the fascia is rotted. Fascia in this area should be replaced. The presence of rot in one area may indicate that hidden dryrot is present in other areas of the fascia". I don't think this is the best example I could use but the best I could come up with right now. I think licensing has set us back in some ways. Clients now consider any licensed inspector competent. Used to be the marketplace and courts weeded out the incompetent inspectors, doesn't seem to be that way anymore. Our state board uses the ASHI standards. Is there anybody on this forum that has ever done an inspection that doesn't meet the ASHI standards? Probably not. State licensing has lowered the bar. You can't legislate competence in any field, all you can do is penalize the offenders. I liked it better when the courts sorted out the wheat from the chaff. I think the answer is simply report what you observe. If you don't think it is a big deal, say so. If you think it might kill somebody, say so. I try to write my reports as if I am the client and have no idea of the scope or importance of the issue. If these people were building savy they generally wouldn't be hiring us. In my opinion, it is important to discover, find, observe the problem and just as important to convey the extent and importance of the problem. I don't think it is fair to label a home inspector a "Realtor Toady' because he/she makes light of an issue. The clients are hiring us to find and report the problems and give our opinion on the importance.