Mark P Posted December 6, 2006 Report Share Posted December 6, 2006 Bradford-White 1993 40 gal gas water heater in a pantry closet with no air vents from which to pull combustion air. There are only a few inches to each side and front and 4-5' above the heater. The IRC states (as clear as mud) "Where the volume of the space in which fuel-burning appliances are installed is greater than 50 cubic feet per 1,000 Btu/h (4.83 L/W) of aggregate input rating in buildings of ordinary tightness, insofar as infiltration is concerned, normal infiltration shall be regarded as adequate to provide combustion air." On one hand I like to think the proof is in the pudding, the water heater has been there since 1993 and everything seems to work fine. On the other hand my instincts tell me there needs to be some vents added. But pudding and instincts don't make for a fact based report. My question is: what the hell is the IRC telling me and how do I calculate it? How do I determine the btu/h of this water heater? The data tag does not seem to tell me anything. Attached is a pic of the data tag on the heater. As always thanks Download Attachment: 1.JPG 86.75 KB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homnspector Posted December 6, 2006 Report Share Posted December 6, 2006 BTU is on the tag, 34,000 / hr. room would have to be 32 x 50 cuft= 1600 cu.ft, 16x10x10. Big closet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark P Posted December 6, 2006 Author Report Share Posted December 6, 2006 Thanks a lot, I can't believe I looked right past the btu/h on the tag. Guess that does not make me today's bright and shining star. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hausdok Posted December 6, 2006 Report Share Posted December 6, 2006 Your math is wrong. It should be 34 X 50 = 1700 cubic feet and if it's less than that in volume you have to add additional venting. The fact that it's been in there since 1993 and hasn't hurt anything only means that it's been installed wrong since 1993 and hasn't hurt anything, but still needs to be corrected. OT - OF!!! M. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homnspector Posted December 6, 2006 Report Share Posted December 6, 2006 Sorry Mike, I was in a hurry. see Mark, if you just wait somebody less bright will show up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hausdok Posted December 6, 2006 Report Share Posted December 6, 2006 Originally posted by homnspector Sorry Mike, I was in a hurry. see Mark, if you just wait somebody less bright will show up. Yep, My math skills are so poor it took me half an hour to do that multiplication. Do you have any idea how long it takes to lay out fifty rows of 34 paper clips each and then count them manually? Whew! Phone kept ringing and I'd lose count, I sneezed once and ruined my calculations, I got mixed up and went "nineteen, twentyteen, twenty-one teen"...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark P Posted December 6, 2006 Author Report Share Posted December 6, 2006 And for those who were wondering (like me) but were afraid to ask (cubic feet) = (square feet) Ãâ (height in feet) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homnspector Posted December 6, 2006 Report Share Posted December 6, 2006 I had to take off both shoes, problem is I forgot I was missing a little toe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.