Neal Lewis Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 A fireplace was built well after the original construction of the house. In the crawlspace, the base of the block chimney was built around the original wood girder. The wood girder is directly under the fireplace hearth extension. I'm second guessing myself since the hearth is at least 8 inches thick. (trying to interpret the code). Tell me this is not allowed no way, no how. Download Attachment: Sahlin 046.jpg 409.54 KB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mgbinspect Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 According to older standards, the requirement was 8" solid masonry and a 2" air space between combustibles and the inner surface of the firebox or flue. The 2" air space got thrown into the mix in the early 80's. No doubt it's funky and probably some form of violation. I suspect reactions will be all over the place on this one, but could I sleep at night with embers in the firebox?.. Like a baby. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Raymond Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 Back when I was doing brick work, full masonry fireplaces got concrete or masonry support for the hearth extension with the floor joists properly headered around it, for inserts the facade and hearth were built directly on the wood subfloor. It doesn't look right, but if the hearth is properly sized and the rest of it appear to be well built I wouldn't be too concerned about it. If the whole thing looks DIY I'd call it. Tom Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Kibbel Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 NFPA 211 Hearth Extensions 8-3.1 ...with no combustible material against the underside thereof. IRC '06 R1001.9 No combustible material shall remain against the underside of hearths and hearth extensions after construction. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darren Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 Tell me this is not allowed no way, no how. That is not allowed, no way, no how. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Raymond Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 NFPA 211 Hearth Extensions 8-3.1 ...with no combustible material against the underside thereof. IRC '06 R1001.9 No combustible material shall remain against the underside of hearths and hearth extensions after construction. There is a problem with those provisions in practice. The mason I worked for built a fireplace fast. The day before, two guys would erect the scaffold and load a hundred or so brick on it, stage all the block in the basement and most/all the interior brick inside, and stage the mixer and the mortar components in just a couple of hours. The building started at seven the next morning with two brickies and one laborer, and we would have the whole thing done to the cap, the scaffold loaded on the trucks, and be on our way home by four. Every one of the hearth extension forms was left in place, if they weren't the hearths would end up in the basement before they cured. That was back in the 80's, and unless the framers pulled those forms they're still there. We never went back to pop 'em off. I only ever saw one mason pull a hearth extension form, he took 5 weeks to build a split boulder interior/hammer head exterior stone work of art. His poor laborer split and shifted enough boulders to build three such fireplaces. Never seen another crew around long enough to pull those forms. Tom Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neal Lewis Posted December 30, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 Thanks, I think I was reading the 8 inch exception the wrong way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Morrison Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 There is a problem with those provisions in practice. So where is the problem? In the theory? Or in the practice? Of course it isn't a problem most of the time. You could say that about any number of questionable building practices. Shoot, a house doesn't even need a roof covering, unless, of course, it rains.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.