MTL_Inspet_Man Posted October 28, 2008 Report Share Posted October 28, 2008 So this is a newly resurfaced roof on a home recently inspected. 2 Image Insert: 115.82 KB Image Insert: 268.68 KB Image Insert: 241.38 KB Image Insert: 214.11 KB Image Insert: 196.78 KBmonths old. Owner paid nearly $10,000. to get this roof done New plywood deck and Built up tar & gravel. note roofer re-used original flashings and did not slope toof to the roof drain. We can now swim up there. Owner now wondering what to do next Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeremy Posted October 28, 2008 Report Share Posted October 28, 2008 Stock it with bass and bluegill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
randynavarro Posted October 28, 2008 Report Share Posted October 28, 2008 That 4th photo is bizarre. It looks like that flashing terminates into the brick wall, but I see the brick wall is actually across the street. The proportions and scale of the photo really missed with myperception. Oh, and I wouldn't bless any of that stuff. Just state the facts. It holds water - not drains it, and the flashings should have all been replaced properly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hausdok Posted October 28, 2008 Report Share Posted October 28, 2008 That's a lot of weight, A gallon of water contains 231 cubic inches and weighs 8.33lbs. A 10ft. by 10ft. by 1in. pond contains 62.34 gallons weighing 520lbs, which is all added to the dead weight of the BUR, gravel and deck. ONE TEAM - ONE FIGHT!!! Mike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTL_Inspet_Man Posted October 29, 2008 Author Report Share Posted October 29, 2008 I agree as stated in report Ponding, water accumulation, does not slope to drain, flashings to be repaired and repalced as required. New homeowner not happy since new roof was thrown in and paid by seller as part of deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Kibbel Posted October 29, 2008 Report Share Posted October 29, 2008 Originally posted by MTL_Inspet_Man New homeowner not happy since new roof was thrown in and paid by seller as part of deal. This is why buyers shouldn't agree to having sellers fix things discovered during an inspection. It usually ends up costing more later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kurt Posted October 29, 2008 Report Share Posted October 29, 2008 Yep, big mistake. Get moolah. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now