Jump to content

Boiler with no pressure reducing valve?


Mike Lamb

Recommended Posts

I've seen thousands of boilers with only a manual feed valve.

I've never heard of an internal reducing valve.

The bell shaped device is typically a Bell & Gosset pressure reducing valve. There are other types of automatic fill valves including one common type that is part of the "Fill-Trol" expansion tank assembly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How does a manual feed valve regulate pressure in a system? How does the pressure in the system get to 12psi with a manual valve?

Does anyone know?

By adding water if needed.

Around here, most boilers did not have a pressure regulator/reducing valve or auto feed before the 1960s. Just a manual valve to add water to the closed system if needed. I've even seen some boilers installed within this decade with only a manual feed (but with a check valve and sometimes a low-water cutoff). I have a 1950s boiler at another house with only a manual feed. Can't remember the last time I had to add water.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How does one get 12 psi in a system tied to a city water supply? When one opens the valve, it's city pressure. When one closes the valve, it's.......what? Of course one can manually fill a system. How does one regulate pressure manually?

Um - you close the fill valve when it reaches the desired pressure.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When things are right, it needs only be done once every thirty years or so.

Just goes to show....something. Not sure what. Not sure what "right" means either. I always thought "right" meant someone setting the system up with a PRV and/or autofill of some type. The only time I see systems lacking a pressure reducing valve/auto fill setup are troglodyte jobs.

Someone fill me in here.....are we arguing that no PRV or autofill is all right and smart?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was an old galv. steel tank located in the attic.

Someone still using the old tank in the attic could mean mean there's no PRV. In fact, it probably does.

Regardless, I'd be telling them to enter the 20th century, and preferably the 21st, and get a bladder tank and PRV/autofill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone fill me in here.....are we arguing that no PRV or autofill is all right and smart?

A PRV is a must.

On a system with a low water shut off, the lack of an autofill becomes an early warning device to alert the operator that there's a leak somewhere.

Clearly, I'd suggest installing an autofill. That said, three of my four boilers do not have one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The lack of a pressure regulating valve is perfectly normal around here, especially with older systems. When the pressure is low, you add some water. Of course many people don't and then the gauge reads low.

Often when I check a third floor radiator there is no pressure. Sometimes air get sucked back into the bleed valve.

We apparently do a lot of things different around here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We apparently do a lot of things different around here.

That's what I'm trying to figure out. Not having a PRV, around here anyway, is remarkable. No, it's more like jaw dropping.

Trusting someone to actually fill their boiler is not in my repertoire. I can't imagine any customer of mine wanting to know how, let alone actually doing it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone fill me in here.....are we arguing that no PRV or autofill is all right and smart?

A PRV is a must.

On a system with a low water shut off, the lack of an autofill becomes an early warning device to alert the operator that there's a leak somewhere.

Clearly, I'd suggest installing an autofill. That said, three of my four boilers do not have one.

I want to make sure that my post was clear. PRV means pressure RELEASE valve. The pressure reducing fill valve is a convenience, not a necessity. PRV's are essential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I know. I mix up the terms because I'm trying to stay current with the trend of using acronyms for everything, which I've shortened to TOUAFE.

What I gather is folks out east insist it's fine to forgo pressure reducing valves because it's not necessary, it's entirely elective, and here (Chicago) it's the opposite. No pressure reducing is recognized as the realm of The Other.

I am not applying social or interactional interpretations. Different areas are.....different, for no apparent reason.

Actually, I'll apply one interpretation. It's an American thing. Americans do stuff their way.

When we were installing the heating system in our apartment in Wuchang, I introduced the fellows to the idea of pressure reduction and autofill. They'd not heard of it, in addition to not knowing about primary/secondary loops, zone arrangements, air bleeders, or just about anything else. When I showed them a B&G device on the internet, the installers all made that sound Chinese make to indicate they get it.

The sense of it immediately sunk in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was wondering if that was what you were actually proposing. Amazing.

People in NJ do this a lot....(?)... Thousands of boilers with people standing there regulating pressure by opening and closing valves....(?)....

When things are right, it needs only be done once every thirty years or so.

So I take it youre not a fan of flushing/servicing boilers on a regular basis?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...