MPdesign Posted December 11, 2014 Report Share Posted December 11, 2014 Concerning existing buildings and homes - When is an arc flash study required and when is it not required? Thank you for your insight and Merry Christmas. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjr6550 Posted December 12, 2014 Report Share Posted December 12, 2014 From what I have read, arc flash is not an issue in 120/240 volt services. But, I am not an expert on the subject. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Kibbel Posted December 12, 2014 Report Share Posted December 12, 2014 It's an OSHA workplace employee/contractor thing. It's the responsibility of the facilities managers to identify arc flash potentials, then establish barriers in the zones, implement safety procedures and protective gear requirements. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BADAIR Posted December 12, 2014 Report Share Posted December 12, 2014 Download Attachment: Single Phase Work Safety Program SMG_ResidentialCompanies.pdf 318.03 KB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MPdesign Posted December 12, 2014 Author Report Share Posted December 12, 2014 I thought that I should pass this along in case anyone was interested. This is what my research has shown: In an existing building, the labeling (therefore triggering a study) must be completed if the equipment is going to be worked on hot. So if you are in a commercial facility and you pass people working on the hot panels while you are there, and it is not labeled, then you should mention it in the report. This may be true in residential as well - I am not sure. Will this happen? Probably not, but it is a requirement of NFPA 70E for those circumstances. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marc Posted December 12, 2014 Report Share Posted December 12, 2014 I thought that I should pass this along in case anyone was interested. This is what my research has shown: In an existing building, the labeling (therefore triggering a study) must be completed if the equipment is going to be worked on hot. So if you are in a commercial facility and you pass people working on the hot panels while you are there, and it is not labeled, then you should mention it in the report. This may be true in residential as well - I am not sure. Will this happen? Probably not, but it is a requirement of NFPA 70E for those circumstances. Labeled how? Marc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MPdesign Posted December 12, 2014 Author Report Share Posted December 12, 2014 It basically tells you how far you probably have to be away from it to not get majorly hurt if it shorted right in front of you. Click to Enlarge 77.72 KB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Kibbel Posted December 12, 2014 Report Share Posted December 12, 2014 I thought that I should pass this along in case anyone was interested. This is what my research has shown: In an existing building, the labeling (therefore triggering a study) must be completed if the equipment is going to be worked on hot. So if you are in a commercial facility and you pass people working on the hot panels while you are there, and it is not labeled, then you should mention it in the report. This may be true in residential as well - I am not sure. Will this happen? Probably not, but it is a requirement of NFPA 70E for those circumstances. Are you inspecting the building or are you the employer or facilities manager? NFPA 70E is the guidelines for worker safety developed for OSHA - it's not for any building codes. If you are going to report on signs for approach boundaries, you had better have done arc flash and shock hazard analysis to determine where signs are needed. Are you going to report on all of the other OSHA requirements for worker safety too? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MPdesign Posted December 12, 2014 Author Report Share Posted December 12, 2014 I am inspecting the building not the practices of the building. So, yes - this is really out of our realm. I originally asked this topic because I had seen it called out on another inspector's report as being required by code. It appears this was not really needed because he had no other explanation other than "complete arc flash study as required by code". I hope that this post helps others who may hear about this subject and need more info to clear it up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marc Posted December 12, 2014 Report Share Posted December 12, 2014 That's an awful lot of regulation. At some point, the plant electrician ends up working more for OSHA than the company that pays him. Like doctors answering more to the regs than the patient. I don't like where regulations are going. Marc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.