DonTx Posted October 15, 2005 Report Share Posted October 15, 2005 On today's inspection, the subject was an older home built in 1972. My guess it originally had galvanized supply lines and at some point someone switched them out with PVC. All the supply lines I could see were white Schedule 40 PVC and Grey (not PB) PVC. I'm assuming the grey PVC was schedule 80. Question 1: Is it kosher to mix schedule 40 and 80 fittings and supply lines? I've always been told not to mix the two. I've never seen any standard that said you could or couldn't though. Question 2: The only times I've ever see entire homes plumbed with PVC is on the DIY weekend cabins and mobile homes. What are the pros and cons (if any) of plumbing entire homes with PVC? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian G Posted October 15, 2005 Report Share Posted October 15, 2005 The grey is probably sch.40 electrical PVC, which has never been approved for water supply use as far as I know. Years ago I ran my old house trailer water line (the main incoming one) with that stuff, just because it's way thicker and tougher and I didn't know any better. I've never had a problem with it, but who knows what extra chemicals I've ingested? I don't know of any reason you can't mix the fittings, as long as the use is for the lower rated one. Someone else may know better though. One pro of PVC is that you don't have to call a plumber to fix a leak if you have half a brain. I had a line in an unheated laundry room bust once in the old mo-bile, on a Sunday long before any build supplier here was open on Sunday. I was able to get what I needed from a local country store and fix it in an hour. Total cost was about $1.50 as I recall. Brian G. Cut & Glue, I Can Do Flux & Sweat, I Don't Get [] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terence McCann Posted October 15, 2005 Report Share Posted October 15, 2005 Originally posted by hausdok Hi, PVC is supposed to leach chemicals into water, so it's not supposed to be approved for supply systems anymore. CPVC is. ONE TEAM - ONE FIGHT!!! Mike Hey Mike, Do you have a link with any documentation on this? Has IRC/UBC eliminated PVC as approved piping for water supply? Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Kibbel Posted October 16, 2005 Report Share Posted October 16, 2005 PVC is supposed to leach chemicals into water, so it's not supposed to be approved for supply systems anymore. If that's true, this is the first I'm hearing it and I'm in big trouble. The way I understand it, PVC from most manufacturers is acceptable for cold water supply. To be sure, I look for the certification mark NSF-pw. CPVC is needed for hot water. Terry, the codes state that plastic supply pipes must meet ANSI/NSF61. That's what is indicated by the certification mark. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Moore Posted October 16, 2005 Report Share Posted October 16, 2005 Originally posted by hausdok Hi, ...but it's been that way around here for the 9-1/2 years I've been here and no plumber has ever had an issue with that call... Mike, PVC isn't allowed for distribution piping within a home, but every code I know of allows it for supply or service piping to the home. I agree it's not common, but do you know of some local codes that prohibit it's use? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Moore Posted October 16, 2005 Report Share Posted October 16, 2005 Nope to that last. Seems we do have the same song in our heads. Mine is missing the verse about "leaching chemicals" though. Never heard that was a concern. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terence McCann Posted October 16, 2005 Report Share Posted October 16, 2005 Well, I looked in our states code book and although it lists PVC as acceptable SERVICE pipe it is not listed in WATER DISTRIBUTION PIPE. I'm going to call them Monday to discuss. I, like Bill, thought it was ok for cold water. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Moore Posted October 16, 2005 Report Share Posted October 16, 2005 Originally posted by Terence McCann I, like Bill, thought it was ok for cold water. Terry, I'd say you are both right and wrong. My understanding of the main problem with PVC is that heat (hot water) weakens it significantly. From a purely practical view there would probably be nothing wrong with using it for distribution as long as it was restricted to cold only. The trouble is that the codes (UPC, IRC, IRC) don't differentiate hot and cold when they discuss what is allowed for distribution within the building. That's probably for good reason as you could easily imagine the lines getting mixed. I called it once in a home that had PVC stretched across the crawl from the service entry to the other side of the home. At that point it transitioned to cu or cpvc. It was only really a continuation of the cold feed and, other than being poorly suported, I couldn't see that it would cause problems. The stuff was ASTM rated, etc. I called it because it would likely crop up again as a code violation when my cleint resold. Whether he did anything about it, of course, is another matter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Katen Posted October 17, 2005 Report Share Posted October 17, 2005 The IRC and CABO before it have prohibited PVC supply piping inside or underneath a house lo these many years. And Donald, Lincoln never said that quotation. It was written by William Boetcker, a preacher, in 1916. - Jim Katen, Oregon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terence McCann Posted October 17, 2005 Report Share Posted October 17, 2005 Jim: Any idea how many is lo? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Les Posted October 17, 2005 Report Share Posted October 17, 2005 For what it is worth, I have had people not buy a house that had even patches of PVC supply liine. Don't know where I got the idea it leaches, but consider I'm in good company with Mike. In the beginning there were several colors of pvc; orange, blue, white and ivory and even black. Grey was reserved for electrical. Then Dow came out with "big Blue" service line. Up here all the Dow lines have been replaced from main to house, as they ruptured unexpectedly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul burrell Posted October 17, 2005 Report Share Posted October 17, 2005 Originally posted by Les For what it is worth, I have had people not buy a house that had even patches of PVC supply liine. Don't know where I got the idea it leaches, but consider I'm in good company with Mike. In the beginning there were several colors of pvc; orange, blue, white and ivory and even black. Grey was reserved for electrical. Then Dow came out with "big Blue" service line. Up here all the Dow lines have been replaced from main to house, as they ruptured unexpectedly. Big blue is polybutylene and is under a class action lawsuit. Also is black and is used for service entrance Branch lines which are gray. All are flexible. White PVC is is rigid. CPVC is also rigid plastic. Polybutylene is not used any more in my area except the higher PSI rated that will not burst under high pressure surges and is only used for service entrance. CPVC, polyethelene and copper is used for branch lines. "PVC chemical leaching"? Over 30 years ago I bought an older home which had galvanized branch lines and I had to install a 200 foot service entrance so I used white PVC because it was cheap. Got to go now I am feeling weak and confused. Can't figure why. [:-crazy] Paul Burrell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scottpat Posted October 17, 2005 Report Share Posted October 17, 2005 The vast majority of homes in my area that have been built in the past 25 years will have PVC distribution lines and some areas allow PVC supply lines. Now the vast majority of new construction in my area are being plumbed with PEX. As for Cauldwell vs. Casey, I am afraid I would have to believe Mike Casey over Rex Cauldwell. Not to say Rex is wrong but I have seen too many inconsistencies in his books over the past few years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Les Posted October 17, 2005 Report Share Posted October 17, 2005 Rex makes too much money to be wrong! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Moore Posted October 17, 2005 Report Share Posted October 17, 2005 If I were a polymer chemist, I could probably tell you that there are many types/grades of PVC and that "leaching" may be a problem with some. But I'm not, and so I can only assume/hope that the good folk who write the codes did some research before listing the allowable PVC for service piping. (?) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homnspector Posted April 25, 2006 Report Share Posted April 25, 2006 "The IRC and CABO before it have prohibited PVC supply piping inside or underneath a house lo these many years." Jim, how about CPVC for supply piping? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.