Jump to content

No bugs!


Scottpat

Recommended Posts

Is it true that more people died of malaria than would have been harmed by DDT? IE - the road to hell is paved with good intentions.

As I recall, DDT is not particularly hazardous to humans. It's still used today in many countries. The problem was that it devastated bird populations by causing their eggshells to become thin. It's possible that the only reason we still have bald eagles is because of the ban on DDT.

Given that malaria is not a big problem in the U.S. the ban here is probably an unequivocal good thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it true that more people died of malaria than would have been harmed by DDT? IE - the road to hell is paved with good intentions.

As I recall, DDT is not particularly hazardous to humans. It's still used today in many countries. The problem was that it devastated bird populations by causing their eggshells to become thin. It's possible that the only reason we still have bald eagles is because of the ban on DDT.

Given that malaria is not a big problem in the U.S. the ban here is probably an unequivocal good thing.

How would bald eagles become exposed to DDT? Was the stuff used in wilderness areas that these birds thrive in?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it true that more people died of malaria than would have been harmed by DDT? IE - the road to hell is paved with good intentions.

As I recall, DDT is not particularly hazardous to humans. It's still used today in many countries. The problem was that it devastated bird populations by causing their eggshells to become thin. It's possible that the only reason we still have bald eagles is because of the ban on DDT.

Given that malaria is not a big problem in the U.S. the ban here is probably an unequivocal good thing.

How would bald eagles become exposed to DDT? Was the stuff used in wilderness areas that these birds thrive in?

The eagles got exposed it was thought mostly through fish... Fish eat bugs that were coated with DDT then the Eagles would catch and eat the DDT tainted fish and it was then passed into the eggs...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it true that more people died of malaria than would have been harmed by DDT? IE - the road to hell is paved with good intentions.

As I recall, DDT is not particularly hazardous to humans. It's still used today in many countries. The problem was that it devastated bird populations by causing their eggshells to become thin. It's possible that the only reason we still have bald eagles is because of the ban on DDT.

Given that malaria is not a big problem in the U.S. the ban here is probably an unequivocal good thing.

How would bald eagles become exposed to DDT? Was the stuff used in wilderness areas that these birds thrive in?

Eagles eat the fish that grew up in the creek and ate the insects.

Eagles eat road kill when there's no fish handy. Or you will see them at the landfill hunting rats maybe and eating garbage. They are a noble bird but they take food anywhere they can get it.

Fast on the draw there, Scott. [:)]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another concern with DDT was the overuse. Yes it was fogged by the thousands of gallons over millions of areas in metro areas for mosquito control. My Uncle would buy train tanker car loads of it and repackage it in brown gallon jugs, label it and sell it all over Michigan. It remains toxic for nearly "ever". Nasty stuff and as with all chemicals has a defined purpose that is sometimes not followed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...