Terence McCann Posted January 9, 2007 Report Share Posted January 9, 2007 The rafters are longer than the ridge board as shown in the picture. Are there any long term conditions that one should worry about with this? TIA Download Attachment: Attic.jpg 137.03 KB Download Attachment: Home.jpg 184.38 KB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrisprickett Posted January 9, 2007 Report Share Posted January 9, 2007 Code violation? Definitely. Future problem? Who Knows? Fix? Pretty simple. Just slip another 2x under that ridge board and secure with some appropriate hangers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terence McCann Posted January 9, 2007 Author Report Share Posted January 9, 2007 Thanks Chris. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MMustola Posted January 9, 2007 Report Share Posted January 9, 2007 If they are not supported properly they may crack over time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rjw Posted January 9, 2007 Report Share Posted January 9, 2007 Originally posted by MMustola If they are not supported properly they may crack over time. FWIW, I see that configuration commoly in older houses in my area and don't believe I've ever seen a rafter spliting (at least obvioulsy) because of it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hausdok Posted January 9, 2007 Report Share Posted January 9, 2007 Hi, I see it on older homes a lot too. Around here, it's common to find a piece of 1 by 4 tongue-and-groove planking used for the ridge board with the heels off the board. Most of those old houses have 2 by 4 rafters spanning more than 16 ft. that are overloaded with several layers of roofing and sagging more than my gut in the center. I've found maybe, if memory serves, 3 rafters that have split out at the end because of this. Doesn't make it OK, I know, but I wouldn't expect to see a roof collapse because of it......ever. Could be wrong, have been many times, still.... ONE TEAM - ONE FIGHT!!! Mike Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolan Kienitz Posted January 10, 2007 Report Share Posted January 10, 2007 Download Attachment: Home.jpg 184.38 KB Could be distance and/or camera angle, but are there lifted shingles at top left and middle left of roof? Has nothing to do with rafters! Comment above ... adding 2x resolves ridge beam/rafter issue all the time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MMustola Posted January 10, 2007 Report Share Posted January 10, 2007 I believe the intent of the code is to give full support to the butt end of the rafter. I agree that is is not common to see cracks. Also, it's not a fair comparsion to judge want may happen with today's wood by looking at old houses with old growth wood. If you have to tell a client why the ridge board needs to be repaired I think explaining that the rafter may crack if not properly supported is an accruate statement. Do you disaggree? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hausdok Posted January 10, 2007 Report Share Posted January 10, 2007 Originally posted by MMustola Also, it's not a fair comparsion to judge want may happen with today's wood by looking at old houses with old growth wood. Do you disaggree? Yeah, I do. Prof. Paul Fisette, my predecessor on the Building Science forum over on the Journal of Light Construction, runs the Wood Technology Department and is the Director of Building Materials Technology and Management at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. He once told me - on JLC, I believe it was - that the idea that old growth wood is somehow stronger and more durable than new timber is a myth. He said that research has not substantiated any provable improvement in strength/durability of old growth timber over new timbers. Now, I'm not an educated guy. Hell, I barely made it through 1st year math in high school. So, when Paul Fisette tells me something about wood, I tend to take it to the bank and make a deposit. ONE TEAM - ONE FIGHT!!! Mike Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terence McCann Posted January 10, 2007 Author Report Share Posted January 10, 2007 Originally posted by Nolan Kienitz Download Attachment: Home.jpg 184.38 KB Could be distance and/or camera angle, but are there lifted shingles at top left and middle left of roof? It's the translation from camera to downscaled quality jpg. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rjw Posted January 10, 2007 Report Share Posted January 10, 2007 Originally posted by MMustola I believe the intent of the code is to give full support to the butt end of the rafter. I agree that is is not common to see cracks. Also, it's not a fair comparsion to judge want may happen with today's wood by looking at old houses with old growth wood. If you have to tell a client why the ridge board needs to be repaired I think explaining that the rafter may crack if not properly supported is an accruate statement. Do you disaggree? I not only point out issues, I give my clients my best judgement of how likely I believe the potential problems might arise. (I've already prepared them in my inital talk to understand that uch in the home isnepction biz is subjectiove and involves judgement calls) So, in tha case at hand, I'd point out the deficiency, tell them the reason for the concern, tell them one possible fix (also mentioning different contractors might take different approaches - SOP disclosure, again) and tell them that I believe the likelihood of any rafter splitting is low. I'd recommend they monitor the situation and repair if needed. [something with a more difficult/expensive fix woulkd be handled differently] If they were exhibiting signs of being awake and aware and reasonable, I might also add: "Unless some splitting actually starts, I'd have to really bored before I got around to this one" FWIW, I use code to inform my analyses: but I've seen far to many problems where code was followed, and far too many code shortfalls where there were no problems, to assume that code is any sort of reliable predicter of performance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charlie Posted January 10, 2007 Report Share Posted January 10, 2007 Hi all, I'll throw in this idea. It is hard to tell, but lets say that the ridge board is a 2x6 or 2x8. For the support of the roof perhaps only a 2x6 is necessary. The extra unsupported part is merely for the increased space for insulation. Obviously the heel should still be supported----just an observation as to how it got to be this way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rjw Posted January 10, 2007 Report Share Posted January 10, 2007 Originally posted by charlie . For the support of the roof perhaps only a 2x6 is necessary. The extra unsupported part is merely for the increased space for insulation. Obviously the heel should still be supported----just an observation as to how it got to be this way. I don't think the ridge board is needed to support the roof - lots of old houses don't have any ridge board - the rafters just butt together. I think the ridge board (as opposed to a structural ridge beam) is mainly intended as an aid to erection - (remember, we didn't have viagra until just a few years ago) [:-bigeyes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Kibbel Posted January 10, 2007 Report Share Posted January 10, 2007 What's a ridge board? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hausdok Posted January 10, 2007 Report Share Posted January 10, 2007 Hi Bill, It's hard to see without enlarging and altering the contrast, but is that a mortise and tennon connection at the ridge? If so, that's a new one on me. OT - OF!!! M. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Kibbel Posted January 10, 2007 Report Share Posted January 10, 2007 It's hard to see without enlarging and altering the contrast That's the best I can do with the Firefox browser. I can't do the link thingie to a larger image. ...is that a mortise and tennon connection at the ridge? If so, that's a new one on me. Kind of - it's a fork & tenon joint. The one in the center of the image failed. This is what I have found in my region: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ozofprev Posted January 10, 2007 Report Share Posted January 10, 2007 Strictly speaking, I believe that's called 'Fork and Tongue' Originally posted by inspecthistoric Kind of - it's a fork & tenon joint. The one in the center of the image failed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hausdok Posted January 11, 2007 Report Share Posted January 11, 2007 OK, Thanks Bill, I understand now. Gary, if that that's a tenon (what most non-woodworkers will refer to as a tongue) on the end of that rafter, and it extends up into a square slot (mortise) cut in the end of the beam that houses it on 3 sides, the correct term, and the one most woodworkers will use, is an open-mortise-and-tenon joint, although a tongue-and-fork joint or fork-and-tongue has been used by non-woodworkers to describe these joints as well. I'd have expected to see a mortise-and-tenon joint used in a timber-frame structure. In his book, The Timber-Frame Home, Tedd Benson, desribes their use for rafter joints at the ridge. I've just never seen one used in a house - at least not in a "modern" house. Of course, Bill works with very old buildings, so he probably sees them all the time. I've been in what is believed to be the oldest surviving building in Washington state - a log cabin up on Whidbey Island owned by some friends of mine - but it only dates to 1855. That would be considered a kid compared to some of the buildings Bill looks at. ONE TEAM - ONE FIGHT!!! Mike Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Kibbel Posted January 11, 2007 Report Share Posted January 11, 2007 Strictly speaking, I believe that's called 'Fork and Tongue' That's what I used to call it until I was scolded by folks that have access to, and study, primary documents pertaining to old buildings. Only recent generations refer to a tenon as a "tongue". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ozofprev Posted January 11, 2007 Report Share Posted January 11, 2007 Mike & Bill: One of the coolest things about this forum is how people express their feelings with respect. You two exemplify that. Since I come from an engineering bent, I may well have a different terminology. The following link is an example of where I come from: http://scitation.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServlet?prog=normal&id=JSENDH000125000001000003000001&idtype=cvips&gifs=yes Thanks Originally posted by inspecthistoric Strictly speaking, I believe that's called 'Fork and Tongue' That's what I used to call it until I was scolded by folks that have access to, and study, primary documents pertaining to old buildings. Only recent generations refer to a tenon as a "tongue". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hausdok Posted January 11, 2007 Report Share Posted January 11, 2007 Ah, so Grasshoppa. I understand now. I would have loved to have been an engineer. I just couldn't get past the math. My brain refuses to comprehend it. Just trying to understand the numbers in the service charges on a bank statement makes my head hurt. When I went through the SF Engineers Q Course, they provided us with a self-study workbook that teaches one mathematics. It is designed to teach you math even if you've never done it in your life. It takes you from 1 + 1 = 2 up through basic calculus and one can work one's way through it in about 2 days. My math comprehension is so bad that I have to break it out every year or so and force myself to work my way through it all over again. Then, for a few months, I'll remain somewhat competent at math until it's lost again, and I repeat the cycle. It's very frustrating. I cudda been a cointenda! OT - OF!!! M. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denray Posted October 30, 2009 Report Share Posted October 30, 2009 When I got out of HS I was going to be a ski racer. Not. Then, a couple of years later, got suckered into going to college to become a doggie doctor. Not. But, I had to start out taking bonehead math at college cause I forgot it all. I busted my ass and got a lot of A's, only to forget it all 3 weeks later into the next semesters teachings. Inappropriate hang glider landing got me into an insurance claims investigation job for 25 years that resulted in downsizing me out. Went to take a test for getting on with CalTrans that had a ton of 9th grade level algebra in it. I ate it big time and got a speeding ticket on the way home. It's turned out that it has all been the Lords way of telling me I am supposed to be a starving home inspector. And the tradition continues. My son only got one B the entire time he was in HS and that was in woodshop. Oh well. He will graduate from Davis with one of the worthless degrees in mechanical engineering. Ah, the rest of his HS grades were all A's. Poor guy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erby Posted October 30, 2009 Report Share Posted October 30, 2009 Do people READ THE DATES on these things before they bring them back to life? - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.